You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@activemq.apache.org by ch...@apache.org on 2006/11/14 08:23:47 UTC

svn commit: r474680 - /incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-jbossmq.html

Author: chirino
Date: Mon Nov 13 23:23:46 2006
New Revision: 474680

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=474680
Log:
Latest export from confluence

Modified:
    incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-jbossmq.html

Modified: incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-jbossmq.html
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-jbossmq.html?view=diff&rev=474680&r1=474679&r2=474680
==============================================================================
--- incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-jbossmq.html (original)
+++ incubator/activemq/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-jbossmq.html Mon Nov 13 23:23:46 2006
@@ -252,23 +252,24 @@
 <!--          
             <div class="pagetitle">How does ActiveMQ compare to JBossMQ</div>
 -->
-            <DIV class="wiki-content">
-<P>There are some similarities between the two; they both support JMS 1.1 and run inside <A href="jboss-integration.html" title="JBoss Integration">JBoss 4.x</A>.</P>
+            <DIV class="wiki-content"><P>There are some similarities between the two; they both support JMS 1.1 and run inside <A href="jboss-integration.html" title="JBoss Integration">JBoss 4.x</A>.</P>
 
 <P>However ActiveMQ does offer some specific differences and advantages (at least from our perspective)</P>
 
 <UL>
 	<LI>ActiveMQ works great in any JVM not just inside the JBoss application server</LI>
-	<LI>ActiveMQ supports distributed destinations across networks</LI>
+	<LI>ActiveMQ comes complete with a large number of <A href="cross-language-clients.html" title="Cross Language Clients">Cross Language Clients</A></LI>
+	<LI>ActiveMQ supports many different <A href="protocols.html" title="Protocols">Protocols</A> such as <A href="ajax.html" title="Ajax">Ajax</A>, <A href="rest.html" title="REST">REST</A>, <A href="stomp.html" title="Stomp">Stomp</A>, <A href="openwire.html" title="OpenWire">OpenWire</A>, <A href="xmpp.html" title="XMPP">XMPP</A></LI>
+	<LI>ActiveMQ supports a large number of advanced features like <A href="message-groups.html" title="Message Groups">Message Groups</A>, <A href="exclusive-consumer.html" title="Exclusive Consumer">Exclusive Consumer</A>, <A href="composite-destinations.html" title="Composite Destinations">Composite Destinations</A>, <A href="advisory-message.html" title="Advisory Message">Advisory Message</A> support</LI>
 	<LI>ActiveMQ supports reliable connections with <A href="configuring-transports.html" title="Configuring Transports">configurable</A> automatic reconnection</LI>
 	<LI>ActiveMQ has great <A href="spring-support.html" title="Spring Support">Spring Support</A></LI>
-	<LI>ActiveMQ supports <A href="composite-destinations.html" title="Composite Destinations">Composite Destinations</A>, <A href="ajax.html" title="Ajax">Ajax</A>, <A href="rest.html" title="REST">REST</A>, <A href="stomp.html" title="Stomp">Stomp</A>, <A href="openwire.html" title="OpenWire">OpenWire</A>, Jabber and has complete support for <A href="advisory-message.html" title="Advisory Message">Advisory Message</A> support</LI>
+	<LI>ActiveMQ supports distributed destinations across networks</LI>
 	<LI>ActiveMQ is very fast; often 10x faster than JBossMQ.</LI>
 </UL>
 
 
 
-<P>We have a performance report comparing ActiveMQ against a number of other commercial and open source JMS providers. You can get the report <SPAN class="nobr"><A href="http://logicblaze.com/product_information.jsp" title="Visit page outside Confluence" rel="nofollow">here<SUP><IMG class="rendericon" src="http://goopen.org/confluence/images/icons/linkext7.gif" height="0" width="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" border="0"></SUP></A></SPAN> alternatively if you&apos;d like a copy of our performance report comparing ourselves against various other open source and commercial JMS providers please send an email to <B>dev at logicblaze.com</B>.</P>
+<P>We have a performance report comparing ActiveMQ against a number of other commercial and open source JMS providers.  <SPAN class="nobr"><A href="hhttp://www.logicblaze.com/common/reg.jsp?form_source=lb-otherperf&form_landing=lb-Resources" title="Visit page outside Confluence" rel="nofollow">Click here to get the performance report<SUP><IMG class="rendericon" src="http://goopen.org/confluence/images/icons/linkext7.gif" height="0" width="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" border="0"></SUP></A></SPAN> </P>
 
 <H2><A name="HowdoesActiveMQcomparetoJBossMQ-Performancereport"></A>Performance report</H2>
 
@@ -284,8 +285,8 @@
     </DIV>
     <DIV id="site-footer">
           Added by     <A href="http://goopen.org/confluence/users/viewuserprofile.action?username=jstrachan">James Strachan</A>,
-    last edited by     <A href="http://goopen.org/confluence/users/viewuserprofile.action?username=jstrachan">James Strachan</A> on Dec 02, 2005
-                  &nbsp;(<A href="http://goopen.org/confluence/pages/diffpages.action?pageId=172&originalId=1519">view change</A>)
+    last edited by     <A href="http://goopen.org/confluence/users/viewuserprofile.action?username=jstrachan">James Strachan</A> on Nov 18, 2006
+                  &nbsp;(<A href="http://goopen.org/confluence/pages/diffpages.action?pageId=172&originalId=15103">view change</A>)
               
       (<A href="http://goopen.org/confluence/pages/editpage.action?pageId=172">edit page</A>)
     </DIV>