You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de> on 2004/06/04 07:59:29 UTC
Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/xsl
page2swf.xsl
On 04.06.2004 02:12, tcurdt@apache.org wrote:
> Log:
> removed the deprecated swf block and added a simple flash example in the hello world section
Just want to point on some errors:
> Index: blocks.properties
> #-----[dependency]: "apples" depends on "forms" (for samples).
> -#include.block.apples=false
> +include.block.apples=false
> #-----[dependency]: "asciiart" is needed by "mail".
Apples should not be excluded by default.
> Index: status.xml
> <action dev="TC" type="fix">
> - Serializers: Fixed the namespace handling.
> + Fixed the namespace handling of the new XMLSerializer.
> </action>
> <action dev="TC" type="add">
> - Serializers: Added support for indentation to the new XML Serializer.
> + Added support for indentation to the new XMLSerializer.
> </action>
You overwrote Vadim's changes.
> 1.1 cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/swf/hello.fla
>
> <<Binary file>>
>
>
> 1.1 cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/swf/hello.swf
>
> <<Binary file>>
Are they really binary?
Joerg
Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/xsl page2swf.xsl
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Le 4 juin 04, à 07:59, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
...
>> 1.1
>> cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/swf/hello.fla
>> <<Binary file>>
>> 1.1
>> cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/swf/hello.swf
>> <<Binary file>>
>
> Are they really binary?
fla and swf are definitely binary files, aren't they?
-Bertrand
Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/xsl
page2swf.xsl
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 04.06.2004 10:59, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> Hmm, but then it has not much to do with Cocoon ...
>
> Well, people are interested in using Cocoon with
> with flash. So we show them how to use it with
> flash. Anything wrong with that?!
No, it only has nothing to do with Cocoon's capabilities.
> Especially since we agreed on removing the swf
> block with this replacement I don't understand
> your concerns.
No, it's absolutely ok. Don't know if I voted, at least I was and am
also pro the removal due to missing maturity and community. It's only
some sadness about having nothing for flash. And due to binary flash
files we can not claim flash capabilities.
Joerg
Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/xsl
page2swf.xsl
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@vafer.org>.
>>> Are they really binary?
>>
>>
>> They are! Thanks for the cross check!
>
>
> Hmm, but then it has not much to do with Cocoon ...
?
Well, people are interested in using Cocoon with
with flash. So we show them how to use it with
flash. Anything wrong with that?!
Especially since we agreed on removing the swf
block with this replacement I don't understand
your concerns.
cheers
--
Torsten
Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/xsl
page2swf.xsl
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 04.06.2004 09:29, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> 1.1
>>> cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/swf/hello.fla
>>> <<Binary file>>
>>> 1.1
>>> cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/swf/hello.swf
>>> <<Binary file>>
>>
>> Are they really binary?
>
> They are! Thanks for the cross check!
Hmm, but then it has not much to do with Cocoon ...
Joerg
Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/xsl
page2swf.xsl
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@vafer.org>.
>> #-----[dependency]: "apples" depends on "forms" (for samples).
>> -#include.block.apples=false
>> +include.block.apples=false
>> #-----[dependency]: "asciiart" is needed by "mail".
ups! ...that wasn't intended
*torsten rushing away fixing it*
> Apples should not be excluded by default.
>> 1.1
>> cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/swf/hello.fla
>> <<Binary file>>
>> 1.1
>> cocoon-2.1/src/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/swf/hello.swf
>> <<Binary file>>
>
>
> Are they really binary?
They are! Thanks for the cross check!
cheers
--
Torsten