Re: general/8437: found 5 runaway httpd processes

["d@rkman" <fl...@dada.it>]

The following reply was made to PR general/8437; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "d@rkman" <fl...@dada.it>
To: <ap...@apache.org>,
	<br...@medispecialty.com>,
	<su...@bugz.apache.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: general/8437: found 5 runaway httpd processes
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 09:11:57 +0200

 I have Windows Me installed and tried Apache 1.3.20. I have Personal Web
 Server on port 80 and I set Apache to listen port 8080 in order to run both
 web servers in a time.
 Apache seems to create a system crash and I am forced not only to reset, but
 also to switch off power because the pc refuse to shutdown.
 In your view could it depends on incompatibility with WinMe?
 Enrico Dini
 
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "Bruce Speyer" <br...@medispecialty.com>
 To: <su...@bugz.apache.org>
 Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 11:02 PM
 Subject: general/8437: found 5 runaway httpd processes
 
 
 >
 > >Number:         8437
 > >Category:       general
 > >Synopsis:       found 5 runaway httpd processes
 > >Confidential:   no
 > >Severity:       critical
 > >Priority:       medium
 > >Responsible:    apache
 > >State:          open
 > >Quarter:
 > >Keywords:
 > >Date-Required:
 > >Class:          sw-bug
 > >Submitter-Id:   apache
 > >Arrival-Date:   Sun Sep 30 14:10:00 PDT 2001
 > >Closed-Date:
 > >Last-Modified:
 > >Originator:     bruce.speyer@medispecialty.com
 > >Release:        2.0.16 beta
 > >Organization:
 > apache
 > >Environment:
 > Linux RedHat 6.2 Kernel 2.2.16 Gnu C dual-processor Dell server
 > >Description:
 > I moved from 1.3.14 to 2.0.16 last night because said ready for public to
 try.  When I checked this afternoon there were 95 httpd processes and 5 of
 them had accumlated from 40 to 400 minutes of CPU time each and between then
 were using all available computes.  I could not stop httpd and had to reboot
 back into 1.3.14 because this is a heavily utilized production server.
 > >How-To-Repeat:
 >
 > >Fix:
 > I am not a Apache developer but if there is anyway I can assist you in
 debugging please let me know.  I can not use version 2 yet because of this
 problem.  Thanks, Bruce 512-418-2922 bruce.speyer@medispecialty.com
 > >Release-Note:
 > >Audit-Trail:
 > >Unformatted:
 >  [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
 >  [to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
 >  [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
 >  [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or      ]
 >  ["Re: general/1098:").  If the subject doesn't match this       ]
 >  [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored.  The       ]
 >  ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from  ]
 >  [the database automatically because of the potential for mail   ]
 >  [loops.  If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
 >  [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a  ]
 >  [developer.  Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!     ]
 >
 >
 >
 >
 
 
 ---
 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.282 / Virus Database: 150 - Release Date: 25/09/2001