You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Simon Pepping <sp...@leverkruid.eu> on 2010/02/23 19:25:45 UTC
Re: svn commit: r911800 - in
/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs: 0.94/upgrading.xml
0.95/upgrading.xml trunk/upgrading.xml
Note that pages 0.94/upgrading.xml and 0.95/upgrading.xml talk about
versions 0.94 and 0.95, even though the page calls it the latest
version. I think it is not correct to talk about FO 1.1 here, because
at the time of the releases FO 1.1 was not really considered. These
pages are as they were included in those releases, and therefore I
think they should not be updated at all except for glaring errors.
Simon
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:37:51PM -0000, psancho@apache.org wrote:
> Author: psancho
> Date: Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
> New Revision: 911800
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911800&view=rev
> Log:
> Fop WebSite: XSL-FO 1.0 references were still there; fixed now
>
> Modified:
> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml
> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml
>
> Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml?rev=911800&r1=911799&r2=911800&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml (original)
> +++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> <section id="important">
> <title>Important!</title>
> <p>
> - If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a few very important things
> + If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a few very important things
> to consider:
> </p>
> <ul>
> @@ -63,21 +63,21 @@
> </li>
> <li>
> <p>
> - The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the XSL-FO 1.0 specification.
> + The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the XSL-FO 1.1 specification.
> Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to produce warnings or even errors
> now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in the new code.
> </p>
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
Re: svn commit: r911800 - in
/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs: 0.94/upgrading.xml
0.95/upgrading.xml trunk/upgrading.xml
Posted by Simon Pepping <sp...@leverkruid.eu>.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:50:51AM +0000, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pascal Sancho wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I partially agree, but...:
> > - both releases (0.94: 2007, 0.95: 2008) are posterior to REC 1.1 (2006);
> > - both releases implement some REC 1.1 new features (Cf. bookmarks).
> >
> > I can revert the change, but that will not reflect the above things, IMHO.
> > WDYT?
>
> I too agree with the principle, but in the present case the move to
> XSL-FO 1.1 was made before the release of FOP 0.94:
> http://markmail.org/thread/ku643qmlfklrloya
> So it???s rather the website that was lagging way behind, and Pascal???s
> change was actually a fix IMO.
This change is not a big deal. You can act as you see fit, based on
other people's comments. I just want to point out that updating info
about earlier releases is often not appropriate.
Regards, Simon
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
Re: svn commit: r911800 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs:
0.94/upgrading.xml 0.95/upgrading.xml trunk/upgrading.xml
Posted by Vincent Hennebert <vh...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Pascal Sancho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I partially agree, but...:
> - both releases (0.94: 2007, 0.95: 2008) are posterior to REC 1.1 (2006);
> - both releases implement some REC 1.1 new features (Cf. bookmarks).
>
> I can revert the change, but that will not reflect the above things, IMHO.
> WDYT?
I too agree with the principle, but in the present case the move to
XSL-FO 1.1 was made before the release of FOP 0.94:
http://markmail.org/thread/ku643qmlfklrloya
So it’s rather the website that was lagging way behind, and Pascal’s
change was actually a fix IMO.
Vincent
> --
> Pascal
>
> Simon Pepping a écrit :
>> Note that pages 0.94/upgrading.xml and 0.95/upgrading.xml talk about
>> versions 0.94 and 0.95, even though the page calls it the latest
>> version. I think it is not correct to talk about FO 1.1 here, because
>> at the time of the releases FO 1.1 was not really considered. These
>> pages are as they were included in those releases, and therefore I
>> think they should not be updated at all except for glaring errors.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:37:51PM -0000, psancho@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> Author: psancho
>>> Date: Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
>>> New Revision: 911800
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911800&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Fop WebSite: XSL-FO 1.0 references were still there; fixed now
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
>>> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml
>>> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml?rev=911800&r1=911799&r2=911800&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml (original)
>>> +++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
>>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>>> <section id="important">
>>> <title>Important!</title>
>>> <p>
>>> - If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a few very important things
>>> + If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a few very important things
>>> to consider:
>>> </p>
>>> <ul>
>>> @@ -63,21 +63,21 @@
>>> </li>
>>> <li>
>>> <p>
>>> - The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the XSL-FO 1.0 specification.
>>> + The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the XSL-FO 1.1 specification.
>>> Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to produce warnings or even errors
>>> now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in the new code.
>>> </p>
Re: svn commit: r911800 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs:
0.94/upgrading.xml 0.95/upgrading.xml trunk/upgrading.xml
Posted by Pascal Sancho <pa...@takoma.fr>.
Hi,
I partially agree, but...:
- both releases (0.94: 2007, 0.95: 2008) are posterior to REC 1.1 (2006);
- both releases implement some REC 1.1 new features (Cf. bookmarks).
I can revert the change, but that will not reflect the above things, IMHO.
WDYT?
--
Pascal
Simon Pepping a écrit :
> Note that pages 0.94/upgrading.xml and 0.95/upgrading.xml talk about
> versions 0.94 and 0.95, even though the page calls it the latest
> version. I think it is not correct to talk about FO 1.1 here, because
> at the time of the releases FO 1.1 was not really considered. These
> pages are as they were included in those releases, and therefore I
> think they should not be updated at all except for glaring errors.
>
> Simon
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:37:51PM -0000, psancho@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: psancho
>> Date: Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
>> New Revision: 911800
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911800&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fop WebSite: XSL-FO 1.0 references were still there; fixed now
>>
>> Modified:
>> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
>> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml
>> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml
>>
>> Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml?rev=911800&r1=911799&r2=911800&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml (original)
>> +++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>> <section id="important">
>> <title>Important!</title>
>> <p>
>> - If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a few very important things
>> + If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a few very important things
>> to consider:
>> </p>
>> <ul>
>> @@ -63,21 +63,21 @@
>> </li>
>> <li>
>> <p>
>> - The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the XSL-FO 1.0 specification.
>> + The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the XSL-FO 1.1 specification.
>> Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to produce warnings or even errors
>> now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in the new code.
>> </p>
>>
>