Re: [PATCH] JUnit test for org.apache.geronimo.cache.SimpleInstanceCache

[Micah Kornfield <mk...@comcast.net>]

Bruce Snyder wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Ed Letifov said:
> 
> EL> Maybe a stupid question, but how do you submit a patch that contains
> EL> a new file, rather then a _patch_ to an existing revision?
> EL>
> EL> Anyway, the test is in the attachment. As I said before: started with
> EL> the simplest, hope it helps.
> 
> I can certainly commit this test as I'll be writing a bunch of these
> later tonight. However, I'd like to try to make a decision on what we're
> going to do to to determine spec coverage first. Although spec coverage
> is crucial, we also just need some simple test coverage of the existing
> code base. 
> 
> I'm wondering if there's a need for two kinds of tests - unit and
> spec. Of course, these two can be achieved in the same *Test.java files
> and separated simply by a comment line.
> 
> Bruce

This might be a stupid question but, wouldn't spec tests be covered in 
the certification procedure by sun? or do we need more detailed tests 
than these?
-Micah

RE: [PATCH] JUnit test for org.apache.geronimo.cache.SimpleInstanceCache

[Jeremy Boynes <je...@coredevelopers.net>]

> This might be a stupid question but, wouldn't spec tests be covered in
> the certification procedure by sun? or do we need more detailed tests
> than these?

The tests in the TCK are covered by an NDA which is going to be an
interesting challenge (one I hope others at ASF are used to handling).
Because of that though, the more tests we have from people who have not seen
the TCK, the better for everyone.

--
Jeremy