You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by John Wang <jo...@gmail.com> on 2008/02/04 20:52:44 UTC
lucene 2.3 in production
Hi:
Is there anyone running a full production deployment on lucene 2.3 (with
high traffic, large index and frequent updates)? We are thinking of doing
this but wanted to get some feedback.
Thanks
-John
Re: lucene 2.3 in production
Posted by John Wang <jo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Mark for the datapoint!
-John
On Feb 4, 2008 4:50 PM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Replied to the wrong thread - sorry about that.
>
> But to make up for it, I have been using 2.3 even before it was
> released. I have so many tests for my app that I am pretty confident
> running things off the trunk if all tests are a go, and there where so
> many goodies for 2.3 that I jumped on pretty early.
>
> I have not had a single issue. Very frequent updates, 200k-3 million
> docs, not insane traffic - but continuous traffic from a limited set of
> users (a couple constantly updating, and 10-30 constantly searching at
> each site).
>
> John Wang wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > Is there anyone running a full production deployment on lucene 2.3(with
> > high traffic, large index and frequent updates)? We are thinking of
> doing
> > this but wanted to get some feedback.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -John
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: lucene 2.3 in production
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
Replied to the wrong thread - sorry about that.
But to make up for it, I have been using 2.3 even before it was
released. I have so many tests for my app that I am pretty confident
running things off the trunk if all tests are a go, and there where so
many goodies for 2.3 that I jumped on pretty early.
I have not had a single issue. Very frequent updates, 200k-3 million
docs, not insane traffic - but continuous traffic from a limited set of
users (a couple constantly updating, and 10-30 constantly searching at
each site).
John Wang wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Is there anyone running a full production deployment on lucene 2.3 (with
> high traffic, large index and frequent updates)? We are thinking of doing
> this but wanted to get some feedback.
>
> Thanks
>
> -John
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: lucene 2.3 in production
Posted by Steven A Rowe <sa...@syr.edu>.
Hi GokulAnand,
On 02/05/2008 at 12:33 AM, GokulAnand wrote:
> Can some one get me the link to get lucene 2.3 jars.
It is considered bad form on this list to reply to an existing thread with a message on a different topic than the one already being discussed - this is called "thread hijacking". If you have a question not directly related to an existing thread, you should start a new thread rather than replying to an existing one, just like you did with your message with the subject "Lucene Search with relational operators".
It is also considered bad form to not at least make an attempt to answer your question for yourself using available resources. In your case, it is evident that you have not even looked at the front page of the Lucene Java website.
Go to the main Lucene Java page:
<http://lucene.apache.org/java/>
The project description, just under the table of contents, contains a link to download Lucene from the text "free download".
Also, the first News item "24 January 2008 - Lucene Java 2.3.0 available" contains download links.
Steve
>
>
> markrmiller wrote:
> >
> > You still have to be careful if you want to alternate a search and
> > write. If you are loading a lot of docs this way, you would want to
> > hold the Writer to batch the docs, but while you are holding it, you
> > will not have a fresh view of the index - so you could add the same doc
> > twice if it came twice in a batch. The only way to be sure you avoid
> > this is to reopen readers after you add every doc. This is just not
> > going to be a fast way of doing things...but if you have a high
> > mergefactor, the new reopen method will prob make it *much* faster. Or
> > if you are sure that the batch won't contain duplicates, you can batch
> > load.
> >
> >
> > John Wang wrote:
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > Is there anyone running a full production deployment on
> lucene 2.3
> > > (with high traffic, large index and frequent updates)? We are thinking
> > > of doing this but wanted to get some feedback.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/lucene-2.3-in-production-tp15276078p1528 3746.html
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: lucene 2.3 in production
Posted by GokulAnand <go...@gmail.com>.
Can some one get me the link to get lucene 2.3 jars.
Thanks in advance
markrmiller wrote:
>
> You still have to be careful if you want to alternate a search and
> write. If you are loading a lot of docs this way, you would want to hold
> the Writer to batch the docs, but while you are holding it, you will not
> have a fresh view of the index - so you could add the same doc twice if
> it came twice in a batch. The only way to be sure you avoid this is to
> reopen readers after you add every doc. This is just not going to be a
> fast way of doing things...but if you have a high mergefactor, the new
> reopen method will prob make it *much* faster. Or if you are sure that
> the batch won't contain duplicates, you can batch load.
>
>
> John Wang wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> Is there anyone running a full production deployment on lucene 2.3
>> (with
>> high traffic, large index and frequent updates)? We are thinking of doing
>> this but wanted to get some feedback.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -John
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lucene-2.3-in-production-tp15276078p15283746.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: lucene 2.3 in production
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
You still have to be careful if you want to alternate a search and
write. If you are loading a lot of docs this way, you would want to hold
the Writer to batch the docs, but while you are holding it, you will not
have a fresh view of the index - so you could add the same doc twice if
it came twice in a batch. The only way to be sure you avoid this is to
reopen readers after you add every doc. This is just not going to be a
fast way of doing things...but if you have a high mergefactor, the new
reopen method will prob make it *much* faster. Or if you are sure that
the batch won't contain duplicates, you can batch load.
John Wang wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Is there anyone running a full production deployment on lucene 2.3 (with
> high traffic, large index and frequent updates)? We are thinking of doing
> this but wanted to get some feedback.
>
> Thanks
>
> -John
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org