You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chukwa.apache.org by Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/13 22:32:30 UTC
[Discussion] Release 0.6
Hi all,
I am wondering if we should make a stable release of 0.6 to target for
Hadoop 1.2 stable release then start to move toward more active development
to monitor Hadoop 2.0. This will give people stable tools to work with
until we make changes to monitor Hadoop 2.0. I am thinking to cut a release
candidate after including CHUKWA-581. Thoughts?
regards,
Eric
Re: [Discussion] Release 0.6
Posted by Sreepathi <pr...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Releases are good and I think we should cut 'em early and often.
> > There's almost no cost to us or the community for doing so.
> >
> > --Ari
> >
> >
> +1
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
*Regards,*
--- *Sreepathi *
Re: [Discussion] Release 0.6
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Releases are good and I think we should cut 'em early and often.
> There's almost no cost to us or the community for doing so.
>
> --Ari
>
>
+1
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [Discussion] Release 0.6
Posted by Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com>.
Releases are good and I think we should cut 'em early and often.
There's almost no cost to us or the community for doing so.
--Ari
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering if we should make a stable release of 0.6 to target for
> Hadoop 1.2 stable release then start to move toward more active development
> to monitor Hadoop 2.0. This will give people stable tools to work with
> until we make changes to monitor Hadoop 2.0. I am thinking to cut a release
> candidate after including CHUKWA-581. Thoughts?
>
> regards,
> Eric
--
Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
Princeton Computer Science Department
Re: [Discussion] Release 0.6
Posted by IvyTang <iv...@gmail.com>.
Make 0.6 stable is more important.
--
Best regards,
Ivy Tang
On 2013-7-14, at 上午4:32, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> stable