You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Rick Hillegas (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> on 2006/09/19 16:53:29 UTC
[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1363) Derby should publish a well defined
coding convention per the db project guidlines
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1363?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1363:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 10.2.2.0
(was: 10.2.1.0)
Moving to 10.2.2.0.
> Derby should publish a well defined coding convention per the db project guidlines
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1363
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1363
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Web Site
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
> Fix For: 10.2.2.0
>
>
> The DB project guidlines dictate that we should have a well defined convention for coding standards.
> http://db.apache.org/source.html says
> "Java Language source code in the repository must be written in conformance to the " Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language as published by Sun, or in conformance with another well-defined convention specified by the subproject. See the FAQ page for links to subproject conventions."
> We should publish at least a well defined convention for new code in order to comply with the db project guidlines.
> Discussion for whether to reformat or not once that is decided is under discussion in the thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/Code+formatting+debate%2C+confusion+and+wasted+time+%2C+Has+it+gone+on+long+enough--t1710825.html
> but at least the coding standards should be defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira