You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ode.apache.org by Alexis Midon <mi...@intalio.com> on 2009/11/06 23:33:03 UTC

Re: ode 1.x with newer buildr?

Hi Greg,

no changes are really minimum. I think the main reason not to upgrade was to
not impact user's environments. But obviously now, using an old version of
Buildr hurts.
If there's no objection, I'll upgrade the Rakefile to use Buildr 1.3.5.

Alexis

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Greg Lucas <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm curious why ODE 1.3.x can only be built with buildr 1.2.10 - would
> there be significant changes to the rakefile to get it building with a newer
> buildr release?
>
> --
> Greg Lucas
>

Re: ode 1.x with newer buildr?

Posted by Greg Lucas <gr...@gmail.com>.

+1 from me of course. Thanks Alexis!

~Greg

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:33:03 -0500, Alexis Midon <mi...@intalio.com> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> no changes are really minimum. I think the main reason not to upgrade  
> was to
> not impact user's environments. But obviously now, using an old version  
> of
> Buildr hurts.
> If there's no objection, I'll upgrade the Rakefile to use Buildr 1.3.5.
>
> Alexis
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Greg Lucas <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious why ODE 1.3.x can only be built with buildr 1.2.10 - would
>> there be significant changes to the rakefile to get it building with a  
>> newer
>> buildr release?