You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Stephen Butler <sb...@elego.de> on 2012/06/26 00:15:00 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1353748 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py
On Jun 25, 2012, at 23:25 , stsp@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Mon Jun 25 21:25:47 2012
> New Revision: 1353748
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1353748&view=rev
> Log:
> Following up to r1353730, fix a test failure due to passing the wrong number
> of arguments to a helper function.
Thank for catching my mistake, Stefan. I should be more careful when splitting
up a big ugly patch into readable commits.
Thanks,
Steve
Re: svn commit: r1353748 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:15:00AM +0200, Stephen Butler wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 23:25 , stsp@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Mon Jun 25 21:25:47 2012
> > New Revision: 1353748
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1353748&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Following up to r1353730, fix a test failure due to passing the wrong number
> > of arguments to a helper function.
>
> Thank for catching my mistake, Stefan. I should be more careful when splitting
> up a big ugly patch into readable commits.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
No problem!
Re: svn commit: r1353748 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:15:00AM +0200, Stephen Butler wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 23:25 , stsp@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Mon Jun 25 21:25:47 2012
> > New Revision: 1353748
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1353748&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Following up to r1353730, fix a test failure due to passing the wrong number
> > of arguments to a helper function.
>
> Thank for catching my mistake, Stefan. I should be more careful when splitting
> up a big ugly patch into readable commits.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
No problem!