You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by aaronriekenberg <aa...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/21 18:18:52 UTC
Did Jencks amqpool turn into org.apache.activemq.pool?
I notice on the camel activemq page there is a recommendation to use the
Jencks amqpool: http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html
There is also a similar recommendation here:
http://fusesource.com/docs/esb/3.3/jms/ESBJMSConnectFactoryAMQ.html
But looking at the code for jencks amqpool
(http://svn.codehaus.org/jencks/tags/jencks-parent-2.2/jencks-amqpool/src/main/java/org/jencks/amqpool/)
and activemq's pool
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/pool/)
they look nearly identical. Both provide JcaConnectionPool,
PooledConnectionFactory, and XaPooledConnectionFactory. The code is also
clearly related.
Did Jencks amqpool get imported into activemq and turn into
org.apache.activemq.pool? If so maybe the camel documentation should be
updated to avoid confusion?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Did-Jencks-amqpool-turn-into-org.apache.activemq.pool--tp27676866p27676866.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Did Jencks amqpool turn into org.apache.activemq.pool?
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
er - yes jencks is no longer recommended really.
On 21 Feb 2010, at 17:18, aaronriekenberg wrote:
>
> I notice on the camel activemq page there is a recommendation to use
> the
> Jencks amqpool: http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html
>
> There is also a similar recommendation here:
> http://fusesource.com/docs/esb/3.3/jms/ESBJMSConnectFactoryAMQ.html
>
> But looking at the code for jencks amqpool
> (http://svn.codehaus.org/jencks/tags/jencks-parent-2.2/jencks-amqpool/src/main/java/org/jencks/amqpool/
> )
> and activemq's pool
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/pool/
> )
> they look nearly identical. Both provide JcaConnectionPool,
> PooledConnectionFactory, and XaPooledConnectionFactory. The code is
> also
> clearly related.
>
> Did Jencks amqpool get imported into activemq and turn into
> org.apache.activemq.pool? If so maybe the camel documentation
> should be
> updated to avoid confusion?
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Did-Jencks-amqpool-turn-into-org.apache.activemq.pool--tp27676866p27676866.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/