You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by st...@apache.org on 2016/04/17 13:39:48 UTC

svn commit: r1739586 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Apr 17 11:39:48 2016
New Revision: 1739586

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1739586&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS:
  Vote for & approve r1735179 (improved error message in build system)
  Vote for & approve the r1717874 group (inherited props reporting consistency)

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1739586&r1=1739585&r2=1739586&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Sun Apr 17 11:39:48 2016
@@ -87,27 +87,6 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: rhuijben
 
- * r1735179
-   build system: Improve svn_error_symbolic_name()'s data gatherer.
-   Justification:
-     The incumbent warning message is unclear and might have false positives.
-   Votes:
-     +1: danielsh, stsp
-
- * r1717874, r1717875, r1717878, r1716808
-   Make inherited property api consistent over all ra layers
-   Justification:
-     Our ra implementations should follow the documentation... and should
-     be as consistent as possible between each other. Only because the
-     caller uses svn_path_url_add_component2() this wasn't noticed by
-     our code.
-   Notes:
-     r1716808 needed for SVN_TEST_INT_ASSERT macro. I think it makes
-     sense to backport this change to simplify future backports.
-   Votes:
-     +1: steveking (without r1716808)
-     +1: ivan, rhuijben
-
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =====================
 
@@ -127,3 +106,24 @@ Approved changes:
      ^/subversion/branches/1.9.x-fsfs-rep-comparison
    Votes:
      +1: stefan2, rhuijben, stsp
+
+ * r1735179
+   build system: Improve svn_error_symbolic_name()'s data gatherer.
+   Justification:
+     The incumbent warning message is unclear and might have false positives.
+   Votes:
+     +1: danielsh, stsp, stefan2
+
+ * r1717874, r1717875, r1717878, r1716808
+   Make inherited property api consistent over all ra layers
+   Justification:
+     Our ra implementations should follow the documentation... and should
+     be as consistent as possible between each other. Only because the
+     caller uses svn_path_url_add_component2() this wasn't noticed by
+     our code.
+   Notes:
+     r1716808 needed for SVN_TEST_INT_ASSERT macro. I think it makes
+     sense to backport this change to simplify future backports.
+   Votes:
+     +1: steveking (without r1716808)
+     +1: ivan, rhuijben, stefan2