You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Pid <pi...@pidster.com> on 2012/02/02 16:53:12 UTC
[OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
>> We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
>
> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
> content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
p
--
[key:62590808]
Re: [OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
Posted by David kerber <dc...@verizon.net>.
On 2/3/2012 11:22 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Alex,
>>
>> On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
>>>>>>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
>>>>>>> changing its content.
>>>>>> LMAO That might be achievable.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned,
>>>>> by having the response time be random. So you would either get
>>>>> a predictable page in an unpredictable time, or a random page
>>>>> within a predictable time. You just cannot get both.
>>>> Excellent analysis, Andre; it looks like you're qualified to be
>>>> the dev team leader on this project!
>>>>
>>>> D
>>> Doesn't the nature of the problem / solution mean that is has
>>> already been done potentially maybe :)
>>
>> Agreed. Let's just sit around watching until we observe the reality we
>> want.
>>
> How would we know for sure, though ? as soon as the one you observing
> ditto reality observed it, the rest of us may be forked off into another
> parallel universe, along with another you who didn't.
> As a matter of fact, I believe that the fork happened already yesterday,
> a soon as the OP posted his message to the list, and that we here are
> all in a very improbable and silly forked parallel universe. How likely
> is it really that a bunch of reasonably intelligent people on the Tomcat
> user's list would keep a conversation going over a couple of dozen
> messages, about quantum loops and
>
>
>
> oops
ROTFLMAO!!
D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
Posted by André Warnier <aw...@ice-sa.com>.
Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alex,
>
> On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>>>>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
>>>>>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
>>>>>> changing its content.
>>>>> LMAO That might be achievable.
>>>>>
>>>> Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned,
>>>> by having the response time be random. So you would either get
>>>> a predictable page in an unpredictable time, or a random page
>>>> within a predictable time. You just cannot get both.
>>> Excellent analysis, Andre; it looks like you're qualified to be
>>> the dev team leader on this project!
>>>
>>> D
>> Doesn't the nature of the problem / solution mean that is has
>> already been done potentially maybe :)
>
> Agreed. Let's just sit around watching until we observe the reality we
> want.
>
How would we know for sure, though ? as soon as the one you observing ditto reality
observed it, the rest of us may be forked off into another parallel universe, along with
another you who didn't.
As a matter of fact, I believe that the fork happened already yesterday, a soon as the OP
posted his message to the list, and that we here are all in a very improbable and silly
forked parallel universe. How likely is it really that a bunch of reasonably intelligent
people on the Tomcat user's list would keep a conversation going over a couple of dozen
messages, about quantum loops and
oops
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alex,
On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>>>>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
>>>>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
>>>>> changing its content.
>>>>
>>>> LMAO That might be achievable.
>>>>
>>> Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned,
>>> by having the response time be random. So you would either get
>>> a predictable page in an unpredictable time, or a random page
>>> within a predictable time. You just cannot get both.
>> Excellent analysis, Andre; it looks like you're qualified to be
>> the dev team leader on this project!
>>
>> D
>
> Doesn't the nature of the problem / solution mean that is has
> already been done potentially maybe :)
Agreed. Let's just sit around watching until we observe the reality we
want.
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk8sBHUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA2DQCguMIUiaFPujJ+YzL1beiro9bZ
FdEAn30BT8bNoJxufQtxXyWXJ2R8wk9L
=abK6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: [OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
Posted by Alex Samad - Yieldbroker <Al...@yieldbroker.com>.
[snip]
> >>>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
> >>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
> >>> content.
> >>
> >> LMAO That might be achievable.
> >>
> > Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned, by
> > having the response time be random. So you would either get a
> > predictable page in an unpredictable time, or a random page within a
> > predictable time. You just cannot get both.
> Excellent analysis, Andre; it looks like you're qualified to be the dev team leader
> on this project!
>
> D
Doesn't the nature of the problem / solution mean that is has already been done potentially maybe :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
Posted by David Kerber <dc...@verizon.net>.
On 2/2/2012 5:09 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Pid wrote:
>> On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Pid,
>>>
>>> On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
>>>> We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
>>>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
>>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
>>> content.
>>
>> LMAO That might be achievable.
>>
> Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned, by
> having the response time be random. So you would either get a
> predictable page in an unpredictable time, or a random page within a
> predictable time. You just cannot get both.
Excellent analysis, Andre; it looks like you're qualified to be the dev
team leader on this project!
D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
Posted by André Warnier <aw...@ice-sa.com>.
Pid wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Pid,
>>
>> On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
>>> We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
>>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
>> content.
>
> LMAO That might be achievable.
>
Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned, by having the response time
be random. So you would either get a predictable page in an unpredictable time, or a
random page within a predictable time. You just cannot get both.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org