You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Xiaobao Wu (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/04/10 08:31:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-19109) Fix metrics description
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Xiaobao Wu updated HADOOP-19109:
--------------------------------
Summary: Fix metrics description (was: checkPermission should not ignore original AccessControlException )
> Fix metrics description
> -----------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-19109
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19109
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0
> Reporter: Xiaobao Wu
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In the environment where the *Ranger-HDFS* plugin is enabled, I look at the log information of *AccessControlException* caused by the *du.* I find that the printed log information is not accurate, because the original AccessControlException is ignored by checkPermission, which is not conducive to judging the real situation of the AccessControlException . At least part of the original log information should be printed.
> AccessControlException information currently printed:
> {code:java}
> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException): Permission denied: user=test,access=READ_EXECUTE, inode="/warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/test.db/stu/dt=2024-01-17":hive:hadoop:drwxrwx---
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSPermissionChecker.checkPermission(FSPermissionChecker.java:226){code}
> The original AccessControlException information printed:
> {code:java}
> org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied: user=test,access=READ_EXECUTE, inode="dt=2024-01-17":hive:hadoop:drwxrwx---
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSPermissionChecker.check(FSPermissionChecker.java:400) {code}
> From the comparison results of the above log information, it can be seen that the inode information and the exception stack printed by the log are not accurate.
> Later, the *inode* information prompted by the original AccessControlException log information makes me realize that the Ranger-HDFS plug-in in the current environment is not incorporated into RANGER-2297, so I think it is necessary to prompt this part of the log information.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org