Re: [DISCUSSION] Authorization for Iceberg view APIs

[roryqi <ro...@apache.org>]

I think that we have already had sufficient discussion. I will create
an epic issue and split the small tasks for this epic.

roryqi <ro...@apache.org> 于2025年12月9日周二 11:48写道：
>
> Thanks for effort. I will take a look at the document.
>
> Bharathkrishna G M <bh...@gmail.com> 于2025年12月9日周二 05:55写道：
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Authorization is missing for Iceberg APIs for view operations.
>> This also involves a design decision whether to make views as a Gravitino
>> EntityType, or we can just treat views the same as tables.
>> To discuss that, I put a one-pager doc here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CDaKr2IaZaQnd0JxALiGbrSy24pQ98c44PnH_zDTwFg/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bharath

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSSION] Authorization for Iceberg view APIs

[Bharath Krishna via dev <de...@gravitino.apache.org>]

Thanks for the discussions @roryqi<ma...@apache.org> on the document.
Great collaboration!

From: roryqi <ro...@apache.org>
Date: Sunday, January 18, 2026 at 6:58 PM
To: dev@gravitino.apache.org <de...@gravitino.apache.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSSION] Authorization for Iceberg view APIs

I think that we have already had sufficient discussion. I will create
an epic issue and split the small tasks for this epic.

roryqi <ro...@apache.org> 于2025年12月9日周二 11:48写道：
>
> Thanks for effort. I will take a look at the document.
>
> Bharathkrishna G M <bh...@gmail.com> 于2025年12月9日周二 05:55写道：
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Authorization is missing for Iceberg APIs for view operations.
>> This also involves a design decision whether to make views as a Gravitino
>> EntityType, or we can just treat views the same as tables.
>> To discuss that, I put a one-pager doc here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CDaKr2IaZaQnd0JxALiGbrSy24pQ98c44PnH_zDTwFg/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bharath