[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-26248) Should find a suitable way to let users specify the store file tracker implementation

["Hudson (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17512899#comment-17512899 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-26248:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.5
	[build #78 on builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/]: (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color}
-- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console output|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78//console].


> Should find a suitable way to let users specify the store file tracker implementation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-26248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26248
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: HFile
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.6.0, 3.0.0-alpha-3
>
>
> Now all the implementations are marked as IA.Private, so there is no safe way for users to specify them.
> But for simplify, maybe we should not expose the full class name of the implementation classes to users. Just follow the way in WALFactory, to introduce an alias name for the implemention, for example
> DEFAULT, FILE, REGION, etc.
> Thoughts?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)