You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org> on 2008/09/08 17:14:54 UTC
StAX (JSR 173) License
Has there been any closure on the issue of the StAX reference
implementation (both the API jar and the implementation jar)? Are we
allowed to use them in an Apache project?
http://dist.codehaus.org/stax/jars/stax-src-1.2.0.zip
It seems that BEA wanted it under the ASL, but it's unclear if it ever
got "done".
It's certainly not clear from the legal-discuss archives.
http://markmail.org/search/?q=JSR+173+license#query:JSR%20173%20license%20list%3Aorg.apache.legal-discuss
-Yonik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: StAX (JSR 173) License
Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>.
XML Commons and Xerces gave up too and eventually adopted the Geronimo
version as the basis for the StAX API for JAXP 1.4.
Thanks.
Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org
David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote on 09/08/2008 11:44:51 AM:
> Geronimo gave up on trying to figure this out and reimplemented the
> api from the javadocs. For an implementation we use woodstox.
>
> svn https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-
> stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1
> published at e.g. http://repo1.maven.
> org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec/1.0.
> 1/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
>
> You probably know this but many "jsr173 api jars" aren't spec
> compliant as they fix the ridiculous error in the spec where IIRC
> getXmlInputStream returns an XmlOutputStream or vice versa.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Sep 8, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> > Has there been any closure on the issue of the StAX reference
> > implementation (both the API jar and the implementation jar)? Are we
> > allowed to use them in an Apache project?
> >
> > http://dist.codehaus.org/stax/jars/stax-src-1.2.0.zip
> >
> > It seems that BEA wanted it under the ASL, but it's unclear if it ever
> > got "done".
> > It's certainly not clear from the legal-discuss archives.
> >
> > http://markmail.org/search/?q=JSR+173+license#query:JSR
> > %20173%20license%20list%3Aorg.apache.legal-discuss
> >
> > -Yonik
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> > only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> > and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
> > official ASF policies and documents.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
> official ASF policies and documents.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: StAX (JSR 173) License
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
Geronimo gave up on trying to figure this out and reimplemented the
api from the javadocs. For an implementation we use woodstox.
svn https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1
published at e.g. http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
You probably know this but many "jsr173 api jars" aren't spec
compliant as they fix the ridiculous error in the spec where IIRC
getXmlInputStream returns an XmlOutputStream or vice versa.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 8, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Has there been any closure on the issue of the StAX reference
> implementation (both the API jar and the implementation jar)? Are we
> allowed to use them in an Apache project?
>
> http://dist.codehaus.org/stax/jars/stax-src-1.2.0.zip
>
> It seems that BEA wanted it under the ASL, but it's unclear if it ever
> got "done".
> It's certainly not clear from the legal-discuss archives.
>
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=JSR+173+license#query:JSR
> %20173%20license%20list%3Aorg.apache.legal-discuss
>
> -Yonik
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
> official ASF policies and documents.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org