You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Mark <el...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/13 20:52:39 UTC
MINA and SPDY
Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
Re: MINA and SPDY
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Mark <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> forgot to add a link...
>
> http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
Interesting. Worth exploring further :-)
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: MINA and SPDY
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
> Thanks.
>
> The protocol buffer codec might work. I will look at it and try to
> see how it might work.
>
> The biggest problem is that the spec is still in draft form and
> changing daily. I am trying to keep up with them.
>
> ..Mark
Would you mind my touching code inside your folder in sandbox :-)
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: MINA and SPDY
Posted by Mark <el...@gmail.com>.
Thanks.
The protocol buffer codec might work. I will look at it and try to
see how it might work.
The biggest problem is that the spec is still in draft form and
changing daily. I am trying to keep up with them.
..Mark
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Mark <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am working on a prototype implementation in my sandbox. Hope to
>> have a working version in a week or so.
>
> Mark,
>
> I was just browsing the spec and your implementation in sandbox.
> Was wondering, if using protocol buffer codec would be a good idea for
> implementing SPDY or not?
>
> Well, I might lend you a helping hand in implementation :-)
>
> --
> thanks
> ashish
>
Re: MINA and SPDY
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Mark <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am working on a prototype implementation in my sandbox. Hope to
> have a working version in a week or so.
Mark,
I was just browsing the spec and your implementation in sandbox.
Was wondering, if using protocol buffer codec would be a good idea for
implementing SPDY or not?
Well, I might lend you a helping hand in implementation :-)
--
thanks
ashish
Re: MINA and SPDY
Posted by Mark <el...@gmail.com>.
I am working on a prototype implementation in my sandbox. Hope to
have a working version in a week or so.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Julien Vermillard
<jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> Le Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:53:19 -0500,
> Mark <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> forgot to add a link...
>>
>> http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
>> >
>
> 2 way requests, efficient pipelining, sounds yummy !
>
> Julien
>
Re: MINA and SPDY
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
Le Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:53:19 -0500,
Mark <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> forgot to add a link...
>
> http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
> >
2 way requests, efficient pipelining, sounds yummy !
Julien
Re: MINA and SPDY
Posted by Mark <el...@gmail.com>.
forgot to add a link...
http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
>