You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by "Patrick Linskey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/05/01 15:54:55 UTC

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-392) Some columnDefinition annotation properties incorrectly used as column name instead of type

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593538#action_12593538 ] 

Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-392:
-----------------------------------------

This was left unresolved earlier. But, as it turns out, a new BEA contribution re-introduced a new manifestation of this; resolved.

> Some columnDefinition annotation properties incorrectly used as column name instead of type
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-392
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jdbc, jpa
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0, 0.9.6, 0.9.7, 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Patrick Linskey
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> When specified, the columnDefinition property settings of the @PrimaryKeyJoinColumn, @JoinColumn, @XJoinColumn, @ElementJoinColumn annotations are incorrectly stored as the column name instead of the column type.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.