You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by "Patrick Linskey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/05/01 15:54:55 UTC
[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-392) Some columnDefinition annotation
properties incorrectly used as column name instead of type
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593538#action_12593538 ]
Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-392:
-----------------------------------------
This was left unresolved earlier. But, as it turns out, a new BEA contribution re-introduced a new manifestation of this; resolved.
> Some columnDefinition annotation properties incorrectly used as column name instead of type
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-392
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-392
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jdbc, jpa
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0, 0.9.6, 0.9.7, 1.0.0
> Reporter: Patrick Linskey
> Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> When specified, the columnDefinition property settings of the @PrimaryKeyJoinColumn, @JoinColumn, @XJoinColumn, @ElementJoinColumn annotations are incorrectly stored as the column name instead of the column type.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.