You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Jochen Kemnade (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/15 09:38:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (TAP5-2477) Improvement of
PerthreadManagerImpl.getPerthreadMap
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14545095#comment-14545095 ]
Jochen Kemnade commented on TAP5-2477:
--------------------------------------
Interesting find. I'm not sure if removing this code altogether is safe. But I guess a {{volatile}} or even a "regular" {{boolean}} should do the trick here. Not sure why [~hlship] decided to use an {{AtomicBoolean}}, but maybe I'm just missing something.
> Improvement of PerthreadManagerImpl.getPerthreadMap
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-2477
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2477
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Maria Fedotova
> Labels: patch, perfomance
> Attachments: TAP5-2477.patch
>
>
> In this patch we removed this code
> {code}
> if (shutdown.get())
> {
> return CollectionFactory.newMap();
> }
> {code}
> And it decreased time per request on 11% (~20ms).
> This patch is already in our production.
> Thank [~mihasik] for the idea.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)