Re: Stuff for 0.8.3...

[Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>]

WhoooHoo 30+ messages today!  Like the old days!  :-)

> I can't imagine anyone relying on this behaviour, namely that
> http://server.com/dir/path.html
> and
> http://server.com/dir//path.html
> 
> give the same result, whereas I have seen at least one complaint in the
> newsgroup that allowing the latter form means that relative links cannot be
> guaranteed to work.
> 
> Apache should fault the latter, and I think this is best done in
> directory_walk().
> 
>  David.

I agree with David's take on this.  I think it is wrong to
allow this abuse of the filesystem. This is just plain wrong.