You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> on 2005/07/22 21:14:33 UTC
[proposal] serialVersionUID?
Hi All,
As I'm going through the code I'm adding serialVersionUID's to the
classes that don't have it but should (according to Eclipse's warning
about such things).
Just wanted to make sure that was not a controversial topic :-)
TTFN,
-bd-
Re: [proposal] serialVersionUID?
Posted by Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com>.
Eclipse does not require it but its one of the 'warnings' that
Eclipse displays. Its easy enough to get rid of with a preferences
switch but it is often considered 'poor form' to have a serialzable
class that does not have the UID in it.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Jul 22, 2005, at 1:37 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, why does Eclipse require/desire this? I've
> only used this with client server applications.
>
> sean
>
> On 7/22/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As I'm going through the code I'm adding serialVersionUID's to the
>> classes that don't have it but should (according to Eclipse's warning
>> about such things).
>>
>> Just wanted to make sure that was not a controversial topic :-)
>>
>> TTFN,
>>
>> -bd-
>>
>
Re: [proposal] serialVersionUID?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Just out of curiosity, why does Eclipse require/desire this? I've
only used this with client server applications.
sean
On 7/22/05, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As I'm going through the code I'm adding serialVersionUID's to the
> classes that don't have it but should (according to Eclipse's warning
> about such things).
>
> Just wanted to make sure that was not a controversial topic :-)
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>