Re: Jackrabbits own FileSystem and unit tests

[Marcel Reutegger <ma...@gmx.net>]

sorry for the late response but I was on paternity leave...

Christoph Kiehl wrote:
> But isn't it necessary for the index data to be committed to the 
> database/pm to get a transactional index? I mean if you commit the index 
> changes from the redo.log in a new transaction you don't really gain 
> anything compared to the current solution regarding transactional index 
> behavior, do you?

I expect there will be a performance gain. rather than committing the 
inverted index, which possibly requires segment optimizations in 
lucene, simply appending to a log is much faster.

regards
  marcel