You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> on 2005/11/26 03:46:29 UTC
[VOTE] Confirm the Struts BSF/Scripting 1.0.0 release plan
There is only issue to be resolved before the release - its name.
Otherwise, I feel it is in good shape to see at least a beta release.
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsBsfRelease100
<http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsClassicRelease130>
At this time, I would ask the PMC, committers, and other interested
parties to review the plan and the state of the repository. Please
indicate your opinion on the plan in the usual style: +1, +0, or -1,
along with any appropriate comments.
Note this this is not a vote on the quality of the intended release,
but on the release plan.
Given a positive result, it would be our intention to roll the release
on late next week, assuming no major issues are raised in the meantime.
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts BSF/Scripting 1.0.0 release plan
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
On 11/28/05, Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> an Action 1.3.0 GA, would then intention be to move the Scripting
/s/Action 1.3.0 GA/Action 1.3.x GA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts BSF/Scripting 1.0.0 release plan
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
Ted Husted wrote:
> In the test matrix, I notice that we cite Action 1.3.0. Once there is
> an Action 1.3.x GA, would then intention be to move the Scripting
> dependency forward?
Yes, in fact, Action 1.3 will allow me to do more interesting things I'm looking
forward to. However, my general vision for these subprojects is that they will
have a life of their own, meaning they should always support the latest Struts
release, but they might not require it. Since Scripting has such a small user
base (anyone? :)), I'll probably just up the requirement.
Don
>
> My one suggestion would be to use SCRIPTING_1_0_0 as the build tag, to
> be in line with the Shale release plan. Otherwise, +1 on the plan.
Done, thanks.
Don
>
> On the subject of tagging, as to the Action Framework plan, we might
> want to issue a tag for each subproject, so that there is an
> ACTION_1_3_0 tag, EXTRAS_1_3_0 tag, and so forth. Once we get past the
> initial Action Library distribution, I'm hoping (against hope) that we
> can release the subprojects individually.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 11/28/05, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 11/26/05, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>>
>>>There is only issue to be resolved before the release - its name.
>>>Otherwise, I feel it is in good shape to see at least a beta release.
>>>
>>>* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsBsfRelease100
>>>
>>>At this time, I would ask the PMC, committers, and other interested
>>>parties to review the plan and the state of the repository. Please
>>>indicate your opinion on the plan in the usual style: +1, +0, or -1,
>>>along with any appropriate comments.
>>
>>Plan looks fine to me - except I changed the dependency to Struts 1.2.8.
>>
>>Niall
>>
>>
>>>Note this this is not a vote on the quality of the intended release,
>>>but on the release plan.
>>>
>>>Given a positive result, it would be our intention to roll the release
>>>on late next week, assuming no major issues are raised in the meantime.
>>>
>>>Don
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
> http://www.husted.com/poe/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts BSF/Scripting 1.0.0 release plan
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
In the test matrix, I notice that we cite Action 1.3.0. Once there is
an Action 1.3.0 GA, would then intention be to move the Scripting
dependency forward?
My one suggestion would be to use SCRIPTING_1_0_0 as the build tag, to
be in line with the Shale release plan. Otherwise, +1 on the plan.
On the subject of tagging, as to the Action Framework plan, we might
want to issue a tag for each subproject, so that there is an
ACTION_1_3_0 tag, EXTRAS_1_3_0 tag, and so forth. Once we get past the
initial Action Library distribution, I'm hoping (against hope) that we
can release the subprojects individually.
-Ted.
On 11/28/05, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/26/05, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> > There is only issue to be resolved before the release - its name.
> > Otherwise, I feel it is in good shape to see at least a beta release.
> >
> > * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsBsfRelease100
> >
> > At this time, I would ask the PMC, committers, and other interested
> > parties to review the plan and the state of the repository. Please
> > indicate your opinion on the plan in the usual style: +1, +0, or -1,
> > along with any appropriate comments.
>
> Plan looks fine to me - except I changed the dependency to Struts 1.2.8.
>
> Niall
>
> > Note this this is not a vote on the quality of the intended release,
> > but on the release plan.
> >
> > Given a positive result, it would be our intention to roll the release
> > on late next week, assuming no major issues are raised in the meantime.
> >
> > Don
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.
http://www.husted.com/poe/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts BSF/Scripting 1.0.0 release plan
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 11/26/05, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> There is only issue to be resolved before the release - its name.
> Otherwise, I feel it is in good shape to see at least a beta release.
>
> * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsBsfRelease100
>
> At this time, I would ask the PMC, committers, and other interested
> parties to review the plan and the state of the repository. Please
> indicate your opinion on the plan in the usual style: +1, +0, or -1,
> along with any appropriate comments.
Plan looks fine to me - except I changed the dependency to Struts 1.2.8.
Niall
> Note this this is not a vote on the quality of the intended release,
> but on the release plan.
>
> Given a positive result, it would be our intention to roll the release
> on late next week, assuming no major issues are raised in the meantime.
>
> Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org