You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Jibo John <ji...@mac.com> on 2010/09/24 18:42:44 UTC
FieldType for storing date
Hello,
I was wondering what would be the best FieldType for storing date with a millisecond precision that would allow me to sort and run range queries against this field.
We would like to achieve the best query performance, minimal heap - fieldcache - requirements, good indexing throughput and minimal index size in that order.
To give you some background, we have a production system that runs in a multicore set up, each core with a maximum index size of 6G each, and, the search and indexing operations occur against the same cores. We store the date with a minutely precision(format yymmddhhmm), and, we use TrieIntField with a precisionStep=1. This works well, however, as a next step, we want to store the date with a millisecond precision with minimal architectural changes.
We could probably use TrieLongField, however, as we understand, this doubles the heap requirements for fieldcache. Was wondering if there is a clever way of achieving this without adding to the heap.
Appreciate your input.
Thanks,
-Jibo
Re: FieldType for storing date
Posted by Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>.
: I was wondering what would be the best FieldType for storing date with a
: millisecond precision that would allow me to sort and run range queries
: against this field. We would like to achieve the best query performance,
: minimal heap - fieldcache - requirements, good indexing throughput and
: minimal index size in that order.
if you don't need sortMissingLast or sortMissingFirst then TrieDateField
should be exactly what you are looking for.
: We could probably use TrieLongField, however, as we understand, this
: doubles the heap requirements for fieldcache. Was wondering if there is
: a clever way of achieving this without adding to the heap.
TrieDateField uses the long[] FieldCache, I'm not sure what you mean by
"doubles the heap requirements" ... unless you are comparing to "int" ?
In that case: using TrieIntField seems like what you want?
(but if you are comparing to DateField, the FieldCache for TrieDateField
is going to be a lot smaller)
-Hoss
--
http://lucenerevolution.org/ ... October 7-8, Boston
http://bit.ly/stump-hoss ... Stump The Chump!