You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@drill.apache.org by "Parth Chandra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/21 00:11:40 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (DRILL-2509) Drill Client threading issue with
m_pendingRequests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Parth Chandra reassigned DRILL-2509:
------------------------------------
Assignee: Parth Chandra (was: Norris Lee)
> Drill Client threading issue with m_pendingRequests
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-2509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2509
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client - C++
> Affects Versions: 0.7.0
> Reporter: Norris Lee
> Assignee: Parth Chandra
> Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> 1. (Thread 1) 1st query receives the last record batch (no data, only contains the query state. Eg. QueryResult_QueryState_COMPLETED) and calls processQueryResult. At this moment, it grabs the lock. Assume m_pendingRequests = 1.
> 2. (Thread 1) processQueryStatusResult is called and drops m_pendingRequests to 0. The lock is still held at this point.
> 3. (Thread 1) It returns from processQueryStatusResult, immediately followed by returning from processQueryResult. At this point the lock is released.
> 4. (Thread 2) SubmitQuery for the next query sees the lock has been freed so it swoops in and grabs the lock. It bumps m_pendingRequests up to 1 and sets sendResusts=true since it sees that m_pendingRequests was previously 0, causing it to call getNextResult
> 5. (Thread 1) After returning from processQueryResult, it sees that m_pendingRequests is now set to 1 so it calls getNextResult
> 6. So now 2 threads end up calling getNextResult. For whatever reason, the server then sends a record batch with no data, has_rpc_type = false, and rpc_type = 0, leading to throwing a ERR_QRY_INVRPCTYPE error.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)