You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by yl...@apache.org on 2015/06/16 13:46:31 UTC

svn commit: r1685769 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Author: ylavic
Date: Tue Jun 16 11:46:30 2015
New Revision: 1685769

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685769
Log:
Withdrawing SSLCertificateChainFile info message at the light of latest
consensus to remove the deprecation message completely.

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1685769&r1=1685768&r2=1685769&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Tue Jun 16 11:46:30 2015
@@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
 PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
   [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
 
+
+PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
+  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
+
   *) mod_ssl: Reduce to informative the log message about deprecated
      SSLCertificateChainFile, once at startup, for the first usage only,
      and when "-e info" is used in the command line.
@@ -125,16 +129,9 @@ PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
                   http://svn.apache.org/r1685097
      2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-deprecated_SSLCertificateChainFile_once.patch
                   trunk works (modulo CHANGES, above is a review patch only)
-     +1: ylavic, trawick, gsmith
-     ylavic: ++1 with the below (from gsmith, not committed in trunk yet),
-             since the warning (once) seems to be acceptable:
-             http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-SSLCertificateChainFile_warn_once.patch
-             Otherwise, the CHANGES entry needs to updated to something like
-             this proposal's (new) description...
-
-
-PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
-  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
+     +1: trawick, gsmith
+     ylavic: self -1 for now since the consensus is to remove
+             the message completely, will make a new proposal.
 
    * mod_proxy: Add ap_proxy_define_match_worker() and use it for ProxyPassMatch
      and ProxyMatch section to distinguish between normal workers and workers