You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de> on 2013/11/23 19:17:21 UTC

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.7 as GA

On 22.11.2013 18:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> With +1 votes from jim,covener,trawick,gsmith,breser,noel.butler,hiding,jblond and h.reindl
> and NO -1 votes, I call the voting closed with the
> result of Releasing 2.4.7 as GA.

Jim I just now found out that the atomics problem for event also happens
on Linux 32 Bits using GCC. At least it does on SuSE Linux Enterprise 10
32 Bits with platform standard gcc 4.1.0.

Not sure whether many people looking for event still run on a 32 bit
platform, but it might also impact people building 32 bit binaries on a
64 bit Linux platform. Don't know.

Maybe at least worth a release note.

Regards,

Rainer


RE: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.7 as GA

Posted by Falco Schwarz <hi...@falco.me>.
> Jim I just now found out that the atomics problem for event also happens
> on Linux 32 Bits using GCC. At least it does on SuSE Linux Enterprise 10
> 32 Bits with platform standard gcc 4.1.0.

I can confirm that SLES11 SP2+3 with 32 Bit is also affected.

gcc version 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] (SUSE Linux)
 		 	   		  

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.7 as GA

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Agreed.
On Nov 23, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de> wrote:

> On 22.11.2013 18:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> With +1 votes from jim,covener,trawick,gsmith,breser,noel.butler,hiding,jblond and h.reindl
>> and NO -1 votes, I call the voting closed with the
>> result of Releasing 2.4.7 as GA.
> 
> Jim I just now found out that the atomics problem for event also happens
> on Linux 32 Bits using GCC. At least it does on SuSE Linux Enterprise 10
> 32 Bits with platform standard gcc 4.1.0.
> 
> Not sure whether many people looking for event still run on a 32 bit
> platform, but it might also impact people building 32 bit binaries on a
> 64 bit Linux platform. Don't know.
> 
> Maybe at least worth a release note.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rainer
>