Getting FDB work onto master

[Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org>]

Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].

I've just pushed out a new version of our 
couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes the 
fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is a 
necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype merged 
to master.

Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build and 
test CouchDB (with fdb)?

Here's instructions:

docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
# then, inside the image:
cd
git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
. /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
# you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
make check-fdb

The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the fdb 
branch to master.

CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to 
these questions: [2].

**REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this point. 
If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to land on master 
anymore.

**QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the next 
CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land more fixes 
on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?

-Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
[2]: https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

[Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org>]

Restarting this thread.

Can I get an update on where things are at?

On 31/03/2020 13:13, Paul Davis wrote:
> There are a few other bits to `make check` that aren't included in
> `make check-fdb`. Updating `make check` should just be a matter of
> taking our test subset and applying them to `make check`.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:04 AM Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb which is a subset of all the
>> tests that should pass. I think we should use that instead of make check
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:34 PM Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and
>>> then re-pushed. I'll push up the other platforms as well (except for
>>> CentOS 8, which still has a broken Python dependency).
>>>
>>> PR for the changes necessary was also merged to couchdb-ci.
>>>
>>> FDB should feel free to merge to master once `make check` is working.
>>>
>>> We can hammer out the wide matrix issues on a slower timeframe.
>>>
>>> -Joan
>>>
>>> On 2020-03-30 19:42, Joan Touzet wrote:
>>>> OOPS, looks like I pushed the wrong image.
>>>>
>>>> I'll build the kerl-based version of the image and re-push. This will
>>>> take a couple of hours, since I have to build 3x Erlangs from source.
>>>>
>>>> Good to know step 1 works! Next step for y'all: fix `make check`.
>>>>
>>>> -Joan
>>>>
>>>> On 2020-03-30 6:05 p.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
>>>>> noting that
>>>>>
>>> https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/
>>>>> now fails because kerl isn't there. related?
>>>>>
>>>>> B.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the
>>>>>> 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the
>>>>>>> check passing, I'm trying this now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system
>>>>>>> wide erlang 20 install instead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> B.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've just pushed out a new version of our
>>>>>>>> couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes
>>>>>>>> the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is
>>>>>>>> a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype
>>>>>>>> merged to master.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build
>>>>>>>> and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's instructions:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>>>>>>>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>>>>>>>> # then, inside the image:
>>>>>>>> cd
>>>>>>>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
>>>>>>>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
>>>>>>>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
>>>>>>>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
>>>>>>>> make check-fdb
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the
>>>>>>>> fdb branch to master.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to
>>>>>>>> these questions: [2].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this
>>>>>>>> point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to
>>>>>>>> land on master anymore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the
>>>>>>>> next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land
>>>>>>>> more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>> https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

[Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>]

There are a few other bits to `make check` that aren't included in
`make check-fdb`. Updating `make check` should just be a matter of
taking our test subset and applying them to `make check`.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:04 AM Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb which is a subset of all the
> tests that should pass. I think we should use that instead of make check
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:34 PM Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and
> > then re-pushed. I'll push up the other platforms as well (except for
> > CentOS 8, which still has a broken Python dependency).
> >
> > PR for the changes necessary was also merged to couchdb-ci.
> >
> > FDB should feel free to merge to master once `make check` is working.
> >
> > We can hammer out the wide matrix issues on a slower timeframe.
> >
> > -Joan
> >
> > On 2020-03-30 19:42, Joan Touzet wrote:
> > > OOPS, looks like I pushed the wrong image.
> > >
> > > I'll build the kerl-based version of the image and re-push. This will
> > > take a couple of hours, since I have to build 3x Erlangs from source.
> > >
> > > Good to know step 1 works! Next step for y'all: fix `make check`.
> > >
> > > -Joan
> > >
> > > On 2020-03-30 6:05 p.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
> > >> noting that
> > >>
> > https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/
> > >> now fails because kerl isn't there. related?
> > >>
> > >> B.
> > >>
> > >>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the
> > >>> 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related).
> > >>>
> > >>> B.
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the
> > >>>> check passing, I'm trying this now.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system
> > >>>> wide erlang 20 install instead.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> B.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I've just pushed out a new version of our
> > >>>>> couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes
> > >>>>> the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is
> > >>>>> a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype
> > >>>>> merged to master.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build
> > >>>>> and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Here's instructions:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
> > >>>>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
> > >>>>> # then, inside the image:
> > >>>>> cd
> > >>>>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
> > >>>>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
> > >>>>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
> > >>>>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
> > >>>>> make check-fdb
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the
> > >>>>> fdb branch to master.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to
> > >>>>> these questions: [2].
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this
> > >>>>> point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to
> > >>>>> land on master anymore.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the
> > >>>>> next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land
> > >>>>> more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
> > >>>>> [2]:
> > https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

[Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org>]

On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb which is a subset of all the
tests that should pass. I think we should use that instead of make check

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:34 PM Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and
> then re-pushed. I'll push up the other platforms as well (except for
> CentOS 8, which still has a broken Python dependency).
>
> PR for the changes necessary was also merged to couchdb-ci.
>
> FDB should feel free to merge to master once `make check` is working.
>
> We can hammer out the wide matrix issues on a slower timeframe.
>
> -Joan
>
> On 2020-03-30 19:42, Joan Touzet wrote:
> > OOPS, looks like I pushed the wrong image.
> >
> > I'll build the kerl-based version of the image and re-push. This will
> > take a couple of hours, since I have to build 3x Erlangs from source.
> >
> > Good to know step 1 works! Next step for y'all: fix `make check`.
> >
> > -Joan
> >
> > On 2020-03-30 6:05 p.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
> >> noting that
> >>
> https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/
> >> now fails because kerl isn't there. related?
> >>
> >> B.
> >>
> >>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the
> >>> 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related).
> >>>
> >>> B.
> >>>
> >>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the
> >>>> check passing, I'm trying this now.
> >>>>
> >>>> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system
> >>>> wide erlang 20 install instead.
> >>>>
> >>>> B.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've just pushed out a new version of our
> >>>>> couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes
> >>>>> the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is
> >>>>> a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype
> >>>>> merged to master.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build
> >>>>> and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here's instructions:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
> >>>>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
> >>>>> # then, inside the image:
> >>>>> cd
> >>>>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
> >>>>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
> >>>>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
> >>>>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
> >>>>> make check-fdb
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the
> >>>>> fdb branch to master.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to
> >>>>> these questions: [2].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this
> >>>>> point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to
> >>>>> land on master anymore.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the
> >>>>> next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land
> >>>>> more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
> >>>>> [2]:
> https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

[Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org>]

Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and 
then re-pushed. I'll push up the other platforms as well (except for 
CentOS 8, which still has a broken Python dependency).

PR for the changes necessary was also merged to couchdb-ci.

FDB should feel free to merge to master once `make check` is working.

We can hammer out the wide matrix issues on a slower timeframe.

-Joan

On 2020-03-30 19:42, Joan Touzet wrote:
> OOPS, looks like I pushed the wrong image.
> 
> I'll build the kerl-based version of the image and re-push. This will 
> take a couple of hours, since I have to build 3x Erlangs from source.
> 
> Good to know step 1 works! Next step for y'all: fix `make check`.
> 
> -Joan
> 
> On 2020-03-30 6:05 p.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
>> noting that 
>> https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/ 
>> now fails because kerl isn't there. related?
>>
>> B.
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the 
>>> 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related).
>>>
>>> B.
>>>
>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the 
>>>> check passing, I'm trying this now.
>>>>
>>>> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system 
>>>> wide erlang 20 install instead.
>>>>
>>>> B.
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just pushed out a new version of our 
>>>>> couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes 
>>>>> the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is 
>>>>> a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype 
>>>>> merged to master.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build 
>>>>> and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's instructions:
>>>>>
>>>>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>>>>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>>>>> # then, inside the image:
>>>>> cd
>>>>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
>>>>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
>>>>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
>>>>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
>>>>> make check-fdb
>>>>>
>>>>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the 
>>>>> fdb branch to master.
>>>>>
>>>>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to 
>>>>> these questions: [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this 
>>>>> point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to 
>>>>> land on master anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the 
>>>>> next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land 
>>>>> more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
>>>>> [2]: https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
>>>>
>>>
>>

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

[Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org>]

OOPS, looks like I pushed the wrong image.

I'll build the kerl-based version of the image and re-push. This will 
take a couple of hours, since I have to build 3x Erlangs from source.

Good to know step 1 works! Next step for y'all: fix `make check`.

-Joan

On 2020-03-30 6:05 p.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
> noting that https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/ now fails because kerl isn't there. related?
> 
> B.
> 
>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related).
>>
>> B.
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check passing, I'm trying this now.
>>>
>>> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system wide erlang 20 install instead.
>>>
>>> B.
>>>
>>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
>>>>
>>>> I've just pushed out a new version of our couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype merged to master.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
>>>>
>>>> Here's instructions:
>>>>
>>>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>>>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>>>> # then, inside the image:
>>>> cd
>>>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
>>>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
>>>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
>>>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
>>>> make check-fdb
>>>>
>>>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the fdb branch to master.
>>>>
>>>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to these questions: [2].
>>>>
>>>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to land on master anymore.
>>>>
>>>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
>>>>
>>>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
>>>> [2]: https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
>>>
>>
> 

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

[Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>]

noting that https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/ now fails because kerl isn't there. related?

B.

> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related).
> 
> B.
> 
>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check passing, I'm trying this now.
>> 
>> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system wide erlang 20 install instead.
>> 
>> B.
>> 
>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
>>> 
>>> I've just pushed out a new version of our couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype merged to master.
>>> 
>>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
>>> 
>>> Here's instructions:
>>> 
>>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>>> # then, inside the image:
>>> cd
>>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
>>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
>>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
>>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
>>> make check-fdb
>>> 
>>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the fdb branch to master.
>>> 
>>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to these questions: [2].
>>> 
>>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to land on master anymore.
>>> 
>>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
>>> 
>>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
>>> 
>>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
>>> [2]: https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
>> 
> 

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

[Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>]

Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related).

B.

> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check passing, I'm trying this now.
> 
> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system wide erlang 20 install instead.
> 
> B.
> 
>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
>> 
>> I've just pushed out a new version of our couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype merged to master.
>> 
>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
>> 
>> Here's instructions:
>> 
>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>> # then, inside the image:
>> cd
>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
>> make check-fdb
>> 
>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the fdb branch to master.
>> 
>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to these questions: [2].
>> 
>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to land on master anymore.
>> 
>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
>> 
>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
>> 
>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
>> [2]: https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
> 

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

[Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>]

Hi,

Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check passing, I'm trying this now.

First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system wide erlang 20 install instead.

B.

> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
> 
> I've just pushed out a new version of our couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes the fdb binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is a necessary (but not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype merged to master.
> 
> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build and test CouchDB (with fdb)?
> 
> Here's instructions:
> 
> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
> # then, inside the image:
> cd
> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
> make check-fdb
> 
> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the fdb branch to master.
> 
> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to these questions: [2].
> 
> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this point. If they're backend specific, there's no need for them to land on master anymore.
> 
> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the next CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land more fixes on 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
> 
> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
> 
> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
> [2]: https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037