You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@karaf.apache.org by "Jamie goodyear (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/03/07 15:14:59 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (KARAF-783) Improve security docs wrt role policies

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13224351#comment-13224351 ] 

Jamie goodyear commented on KARAF-783:
--------------------------------------

Improved documentation really should be included for 3.0.0, let's try to keep this issue on the todo list.
                
> Improve security docs wrt role policies
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-783
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-783
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2
>            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>             Fix For: 2.2.6, 3.0.0
>
>
> The documentation at http://karaf.apache.org/manual/2.2.2/developers-guide/security-framework.html gives examples for leveraging role policies, but the default one (which is to use the class names) has no examples and is not even mentionned.
> We need an example such as https://gist.github.com/1109431 and clear documentation about the class names used by default:
>   * org.apache.karaf.jaas.modules.UserPrincipal
>   * org.apache.karaf.jaas.modules.RolePrincipal
>   * org.apache.karaf.jaas.modules.GroupPrincipal

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira