You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ripple.apache.org by Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com> on 2015/07/23 09:50:33 UTC
[VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to take some important bug fixes.
Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
The package you are voting on is available for review at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident the release meets requirements.
Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
I vote +1:
* Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
* Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the LICENSE file.
* Verified the build works and all tests pass.
* Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
Thanks!
Tim
RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>.
Yes, I'll do another release. Would have done it already, but I've been out of action for a few days, and likely will be for another couple of days. So it's looking like Thursday my time before I'll get to this (Wednesday in the US). There's also another PR or two I'd like to look at merging first.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brent Lintner [mailto:brent.lintner@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 12:32 AM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Just an update:
The fixes for why I did a -1 are in, so, Tim, if you wanted (and have time) to do another release, I'm ready to vote with intense speed this time. :-)
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 at 21:24 Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fair enough. Is there an apacheripple twitter account? And obviously
> something on the web site should make it clear there was an update and
> what it was. Right now I don't think I see anything.
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > Sorry Raymond - forgot to reply to this. I don't believe Ripple
> currently have a process in place to announce releases. That's
> something we'll have to look into.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcamden@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 12:26 AM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) <
> v-segreb@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> I vote +1:
> >>
> >> * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> >> * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> >> * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova
> >> app
> >> * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
> >>
> >> Thx!
> >> Sergey Grebnov
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> >> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >>
> >> Bump!
> >>
> >> Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last
> >> time),
> and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> >> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >>
> >> Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified
> >> there
> were no new source files that need license headers..." should read:
> "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license
> header..."
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> >> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >>
> >> Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release
> >> to
> take some important bug fixes.
> >>
> >> Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
> >>
> >> The package you are voting on is available for review at
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fdist.
> apache.org%2frepos%2fdist%2fdev%2fincubator%2fripple%2f.&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7c66f844f77a564e2ffcb808d29f350471%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=WMOw6COVuQNHGh%2fcCU7nmwwI5rNE%2fj7Z5W3WpSo0Fjs%3d It was published from its corresponding git tag:
> >>
> >> incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
> >>
> >> While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache
> >> Incubator
> project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple
> contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to
> review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and
> verify compliance with the checklist at
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fincuba
> tor.apache.org%2fguides%2freleasemanagement.html%23check-list&data=01%
> 7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7c66f844f77a564e2ffcb808d29f35
> 0471%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=IjElGATBLCLr6uZUkcLe
> Q2UIrOqjphJ%2bKLTvyy110Ts%3d (however, we only need to consider
> changes since the previous release).
> >>
> >> If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be
> confident the release meets requirements.
> >>
> >> Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to
> dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
> >>
> >> I vote +1:
> >> * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> >> * Manually verified there were no new source files that need
> >> license
> headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license
> information included in the LICENSE file.
> >> * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> >> * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last
> release.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> ======================================================================
> =====
> > Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
> >
> > Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> > Blog :
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.raymondcamden
> > .com&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7c66f844f77a564
> > e2ffcb808d29f350471%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=%2b
> > X8ilWlzYn70BqJJLFzK45xcZwf%2bKrYvK9iPTRVyHAA%3d
> > Twitter: raymondcamden
>
>
>
> --
> ======================================================================
> ===== Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
>
> Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> Blog :
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.raymondcamden.c
> om&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7c66f844f77a564e2ff
> cb808d29f350471%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=%2bX8ilWl
> zYn70BqJJLFzK45xcZwf%2bKrYvK9iPTRVyHAA%3d
> Twitter: raymondcamden
>
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>.
Just an update:
The fixes for why I did a -1 are in, so, Tim, if you wanted (and have time)
to do another release, I'm ready to vote with intense speed this time. :-)
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 at 21:24 Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fair enough. Is there an apacheripple twitter account? And obviously
> something on the web site should make it clear there was an update and
> what it was. Right now I don't think I see anything.
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > Sorry Raymond - forgot to reply to this. I don't believe Ripple
> currently have a process in place to announce releases. That's something
> we'll have to look into.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcamden@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 12:26 AM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) <
> v-segreb@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> I vote +1:
> >>
> >> * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> >> * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> >> * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova
> >> app
> >> * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
> >>
> >> Thx!
> >> Sergey Grebnov
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> >> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >>
> >> Bump!
> >>
> >> Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time),
> and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> >> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >>
> >> Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there
> were no new source files that need license headers..." should read:
> "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license
> header..."
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> >> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >>
> >> Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to
> take some important bug fixes.
> >>
> >> Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
> >>
> >> The package you are voting on is available for review at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was
> published from its corresponding git tag:
> >>
> >> incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
> >>
> >> While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator
> project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors
> and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and
> vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the
> checklist at
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
> >>
> >> If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be
> confident the release meets requirements.
> >>
> >> Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to
> dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
> >>
> >> I vote +1:
> >> * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> >> * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license
> headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license
> information included in the LICENSE file.
> >> * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> >> * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last
> release.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> ===========================================================================
> > Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
> >
> > Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> > Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
> > Twitter: raymondcamden
>
>
>
> --
> ===========================================================================
> Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
>
> Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
> Twitter: raymondcamden
>
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com>.
Fair enough. Is there an apacheripple twitter account? And obviously
something on the web site should make it clear there was an update and
what it was. Right now I don't think I see anything.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Sorry Raymond - forgot to reply to this. I don't believe Ripple currently have a process in place to announce releases. That's something we'll have to look into.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcamden@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 12:26 AM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>
> Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) <v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> I vote +1:
>>
>> * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
>> * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
>> * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova
>> app
>> * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
>>
>> Thx!
>> Sergey Grebnov
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
>> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>>
>> Bump!
>>
>> Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time), and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
>> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>>
>> Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers..." should read: "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license header..."
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
>> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>>
>> Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to take some important bug fixes.
>>
>> Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
>>
>> The package you are voting on is available for review at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
>>
>> incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
>>
>> While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
>>
>> If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident the release meets requirements.
>>
>> Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
>>
>> I vote +1:
>> * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
>> * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the LICENSE file.
>> * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
>> * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Tim
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ===========================================================================
> Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
>
> Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
> Twitter: raymondcamden
--
===========================================================================
Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
Twitter: raymondcamden
RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>.
Sorry Raymond - forgot to reply to this. I don't believe Ripple currently have a process in place to announce releases. That's something we'll have to look into.
-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcamden@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 12:26 AM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) <v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I vote +1:
>
> * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova
> app
> * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
>
> Thx!
> Sergey Grebnov
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>
> Bump!
>
> Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time), and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>
> Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers..." should read: "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license header..."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>
> Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to take some important bug fixes.
>
> Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
>
> The package you are voting on is available for review at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
>
> incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
>
> While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
>
> If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident the release meets requirements.
>
> Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
>
> I vote +1:
> * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the LICENSE file.
> * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim
>
--
===========================================================================
Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
Twitter: raymondcamden
RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Ross Gardler <Ro...@microsoft.com>.
Sorry for the delay, this vote was called in OSCON timeframe and I've had an internal work conference this week. But I just reviewed.
+1
(the concerns below are technical and so I will let the technical folks decide whether it's a blocker or not)
-----Original Message-----
From: Brent Lintner [mailto:brent.lintner@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 8:55 AM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Kudos on bumping us, Tim! :-D
-1 (perhaps?)
Steps I took:
* Verified `configure` script runs successfully
* Build test (jake build)
* Build with minimization test (jake deploy)
* Ran tests (jake test & jake btest)
* Quick CLI run and sanity check
* jake rat
BUT:
./bin/ripple emulate --remote http://google.com --port 4000
Is broken for me. I get:
~/Downloads/ripple-emulator-0.9.31-incubating$ ./bin/ripple emulate --port
2000 --remote http://google.com
Options not understood: emulate --port 2000 --remote http://google.com
The lib/cli/emulate.js module seems to validate things oddly:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/blob/master/lib/cli/emulate.js#L38-L51
I am not sure, but it looks like that is the culprit.
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 at 10:25 Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
> <v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I vote +1:
> >
> > * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> > * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> > * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova
> > app
> > * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
> >
> > Thx!
> > Sergey Grebnov
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Bump!
> >
> > Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last
> > time),
> and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there
> were no new source files that need license headers..." should read:
> "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license
> header..."
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release
> > to
> take some important bug fixes.
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
> >
> > The package you are voting on is available for review at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was
> published from its corresponding git tag:
> >
> > incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
> >
> > While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache
> > Incubator
> project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple
> contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to
> review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and
> verify compliance with the checklist at
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
> >
> > If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be
> confident the release meets requirements.
> >
> > Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to
> dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
> >
> > I vote +1:
> > * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> > * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license
> headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license
> information included in the LICENSE file.
> > * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> > * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tim
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ======================================================================
> ===== Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
>
> Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
> Twitter: raymondcamden
>
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>.
If I get a chance today or tomorrow, I can write some red tests and fix it
up. (I'll message here if so). :-)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 at 18:27 Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks Brent - I'll take a look (or get Arzhan to) - looks like a
> regression which I would consider release blocking.
>
> Tim
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:54 AM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>
> Kudos on bumping us, Tim! :-D
>
> -1 (perhaps?)
>
> Steps I took:
>
> * Verified `configure` script runs successfully
> * Build test (jake build)
> * Build with minimization test (jake deploy)
> * Ran tests (jake test & jake btest)
> * Quick CLI run and sanity check
> * jake rat
>
> BUT:
>
> ./bin/ripple emulate --remote http://google.com --port 4000
>
> Is broken for me. I get:
>
> ~/Downloads/ripple-emulator-0.9.31-incubating$ ./bin/ripple emulate --port
> 2000 --remote http://google.com
> Options not understood: emulate --port 2000 --remote http://google.com
>
> The lib/cli/emulate.js module seems to validate things oddly:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/blob/master/lib/cli/emulate.js#L38-L51
>
> I am not sure, but it looks like that is the culprit.
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 at 10:25 Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
> > <v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > I vote +1:
> > >
> > > * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> > > * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> > > * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova app
> > > * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
> > >
> > > Thx!
> > > Sergey Grebnov
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> > > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> > >
> > > Bump!
> > >
> > > Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time),
> > and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> > > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> > >
> > > Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there
> > were no new source files that need license headers..." should read:
> > "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license
> > header..."
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> > > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> > >
> > > Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to
> > take some important bug fixes.
> > >
> > > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
> > >
> > > The package you are voting on is available for review at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was
> > published from its corresponding git tag:
> > >
> > > incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
> > >
> > > While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator
> > project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple
> contributors
> > and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release
> and
> > vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the
> > checklist at
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> > (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
> > >
> > > If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be
> > confident the release meets requirements.
> > >
> > > Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to
> > dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
> > >
> > > I vote +1:
> > > * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> > > * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license
> > headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license
> > information included in the LICENSE file.
> > > * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> > > * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last
> release.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> ===========================================================================
> > Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
> >
> > Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> > Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
> > Twitter: raymondcamden
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>.
Thanks Brent - I'll take a look (or get Arzhan to) - looks like a regression which I would consider release blocking.
Tim
________________________________________
From: Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:54 AM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Kudos on bumping us, Tim! :-D
-1 (perhaps?)
Steps I took:
* Verified `configure` script runs successfully
* Build test (jake build)
* Build with minimization test (jake deploy)
* Ran tests (jake test & jake btest)
* Quick CLI run and sanity check
* jake rat
BUT:
./bin/ripple emulate --remote http://google.com --port 4000
Is broken for me. I get:
~/Downloads/ripple-emulator-0.9.31-incubating$ ./bin/ripple emulate --port
2000 --remote http://google.com
Options not understood: emulate --port 2000 --remote http://google.com
The lib/cli/emulate.js module seems to validate things oddly:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/blob/master/lib/cli/emulate.js#L38-L51
I am not sure, but it looks like that is the culprit.
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 at 10:25 Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
> <v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I vote +1:
> >
> > * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> > * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> > * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova app
> > * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
> >
> > Thx!
> > Sergey Grebnov
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Bump!
> >
> > Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time),
> and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there
> were no new source files that need license headers..." should read:
> "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license
> header..."
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to
> take some important bug fixes.
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
> >
> > The package you are voting on is available for review at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was
> published from its corresponding git tag:
> >
> > incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
> >
> > While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator
> project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors
> and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and
> vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the
> checklist at
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
> >
> > If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be
> confident the release meets requirements.
> >
> > Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to
> dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
> >
> > I vote +1:
> > * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> > * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license
> headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license
> information included in the LICENSE file.
> > * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> > * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tim
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ===========================================================================
> Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
>
> Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
> Twitter: raymondcamden
>
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Arzhan Kinzhalin <ar...@kinzhal.in>.
This is my bad. Apologies for this. I’ve filed RIPPLE-95 and submitted a PR which fixes this: https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/pull/70 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/pull/70>
It just rolls back the validation to previous no-validation state. I’ll work on a proper validation (and tests) and submit it shortly.
Tim, Brent, if you could review and merge the change, it’d be great. Again, I’m sorry about the overhead this is causing.
--
// kai
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:54, Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Kudos on bumping us, Tim! :-D
>
> -1 (perhaps?)
>
> Steps I took:
>
> * Verified `configure` script runs successfully
> * Build test (jake build)
> * Build with minimization test (jake deploy)
> * Ran tests (jake test & jake btest)
> * Quick CLI run and sanity check
> * jake rat
>
> BUT:
>
> ./bin/ripple emulate --remote http://google.com --port 4000
>
> Is broken for me. I get:
>
> ~/Downloads/ripple-emulator-0.9.31-incubating$ ./bin/ripple emulate --port
> 2000 --remote http://google.com
> Options not understood: emulate --port 2000 --remote http://google.com
>
> The lib/cli/emulate.js module seems to validate things oddly:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/blob/master/lib/cli/emulate.js#L38-L51
>
> I am not sure, but it looks like that is the culprit.
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 at 10:25 Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
>> <v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>> I vote +1:
>>>
>>> * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
>>> * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
>>> * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova app
>>> * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
>>>
>>> Thx!
>>> Sergey Grebnov
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
>>> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>>>
>>> Bump!
>>>
>>> Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time),
>> and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
>>> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>>>
>>> Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there
>> were no new source files that need license headers..." should read:
>> "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license
>> header..."
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
>>> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>>>
>>> Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to
>> take some important bug fixes.
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
>>>
>>> The package you are voting on is available for review at
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was
>> published from its corresponding git tag:
>>>
>>> incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
>>>
>>> While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator
>> project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors
>> and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and
>> vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the
>> checklist at
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>> (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
>>>
>>> If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be
>> confident the release meets requirements.
>>>
>>> Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to
>> dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
>>>
>>> I vote +1:
>>> * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
>>> * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license
>> headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license
>> information included in the LICENSE file.
>>> * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
>>> * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ===========================================================================
>> Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
>>
>> Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
>> Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
>> Twitter: raymondcamden
>>
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org>.
+1 (formally reviewed)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015, at 17:54, Brent Lintner wrote:
> Kudos on bumping us, Tim! :-D
>
> -1 (perhaps?)
>
> Steps I took:
>
> * Verified `configure` script runs successfully
> * Build test (jake build)
> * Build with minimization test (jake deploy)
> * Ran tests (jake test & jake btest)
> * Quick CLI run and sanity check
> * jake rat
>
> BUT:
>
> ./bin/ripple emulate --remote http://google.com --port 4000
>
> Is broken for me. I get:
>
> ~/Downloads/ripple-emulator-0.9.31-incubating$ ./bin/ripple emulate
> --port
> 2000 --remote http://google.com
> Options not understood: emulate --port 2000 --remote http://google.com
>
> The lib/cli/emulate.js module seems to validate things oddly:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/blob/master/lib/cli/emulate.js#L38-L51
>
> I am not sure, but it looks like that is the culprit.
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 at 10:25 Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
> > <v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > I vote +1:
> > >
> > > * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> > > * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> > > * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova app
> > > * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
> > >
> > > Thx!
> > > Sergey Grebnov
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> > > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> > >
> > > Bump!
> > >
> > > Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time),
> > and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> > > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> > >
> > > Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there
> > were no new source files that need license headers..." should read:
> > "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license
> > header..."
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> > > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> > >
> > > Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to
> > take some important bug fixes.
> > >
> > > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
> > >
> > > The package you are voting on is available for review at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was
> > published from its corresponding git tag:
> > >
> > > incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
> > >
> > > While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator
> > project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors
> > and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and
> > vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the
> > checklist at
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> > (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
> > >
> > > If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be
> > confident the release meets requirements.
> > >
> > > Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to
> > dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
> > >
> > > I vote +1:
> > > * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> > > * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license
> > headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license
> > information included in the LICENSE file.
> > > * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> > > * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ===========================================================================
> > Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
> >
> > Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> > Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
> > Twitter: raymondcamden
> >
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Brent Lintner <br...@gmail.com>.
Kudos on bumping us, Tim! :-D
-1 (perhaps?)
Steps I took:
* Verified `configure` script runs successfully
* Build test (jake build)
* Build with minimization test (jake deploy)
* Ran tests (jake test & jake btest)
* Quick CLI run and sanity check
* jake rat
BUT:
./bin/ripple emulate --remote http://google.com --port 4000
Is broken for me. I get:
~/Downloads/ripple-emulator-0.9.31-incubating$ ./bin/ripple emulate --port
2000 --remote http://google.com
Options not understood: emulate --port 2000 --remote http://google.com
The lib/cli/emulate.js module seems to validate things oddly:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/blob/master/lib/cli/emulate.js#L38-L51
I am not sure, but it looks like that is the culprit.
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 at 10:25 Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
> <v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I vote +1:
> >
> > * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> > * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> > * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova app
> > * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
> >
> > Thx!
> > Sergey Grebnov
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Bump!
> >
> > Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time),
> and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there
> were no new source files that need license headers..." should read:
> "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license
> header..."
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> > To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
> >
> > Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to
> take some important bug fixes.
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
> >
> > The package you are voting on is available for review at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was
> published from its corresponding git tag:
> >
> > incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
> >
> > While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator
> project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors
> and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and
> vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the
> checklist at
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
> >
> > If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be
> confident the release meets requirements.
> >
> > Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to
> dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
> >
> > I vote +1:
> > * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> > * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license
> headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license
> information included in the LICENSE file.
> > * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> > * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tim
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ===========================================================================
> Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
>
> Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
> Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
> Twitter: raymondcamden
>
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Raymond Camden <ra...@gmail.com>.
Query - when released - where will it be announced/documented?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
<v-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I vote +1:
>
> * Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
> * Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
> * Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova app
> * Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
>
> Thx!
> Sergey Grebnov
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>
> Bump!
>
> Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time), and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>
> Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers..." should read: "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license header..."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
> To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
>
> Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to take some important bug fixes.
>
> Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
>
> The package you are voting on is available for review at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
>
> incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
>
> While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
>
> If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident the release meets requirements.
>
> Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
>
> I vote +1:
> * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the LICENSE file.
> * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim
>
--
===========================================================================
Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com
Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
Twitter: raymondcamden
RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by "Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)" <v-...@microsoft.com>.
I vote +1:
* Verified installation from npm (ripple-emulator@rc)
* Reviewed package content and CHANGELOG
* Manually verified core 'ripple emulate' functionality for Cordova app
* Verified accelerometer plugin and simulation UI works correct
Thx!
Sergey Grebnov
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:34 AM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Bump!
Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time), and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
Thanks!
Tim
________________________________________
From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers..." should read: "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license header..."
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to take some important bug fixes.
Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
The package you are voting on is available for review at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident the release meets requirements.
Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
I vote +1:
* Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
* Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the LICENSE file.
* Verified the build works and all tests pass.
* Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
Thanks!
Tim
Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>.
Bump!
Come one guys - this is an easy one (especially compared to last time), and it would be nice to get those bug fixes out.
Thanks!
Tim
________________________________________
From: Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:02 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers..." should read: "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license header..."
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to take some important bug fixes.
Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
The package you are voting on is available for review at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident the release meets requirements.
Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
I vote +1:
* Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
* Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the LICENSE file.
* Verified the build works and all tests pass.
* Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
Thanks!
Tim
RE: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Posted by Tim Barham <Ti...@microsoft.com>.
Slight correction to my verification steps: "Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers..." should read: "Manually verified the single new source file had an Apache license header..."
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Barham [mailto:Tim.Barham@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:51 PM
To: dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.31
Now that we have 0.9.30 out the door, we need to do another release to take some important bug fixes.
Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.31.
The package you are voting on is available for review at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
incubator-ripple: 0.9.31 (68f124a84a)
While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident the release meets requirements.
Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM.
I vote +1:
* Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
* Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the LICENSE file.
* Verified the build works and all tests pass.
* Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
Thanks!
Tim