You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> on 2015/07/10 13:05:25 UTC
Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Hi All,
Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's latest
release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete except
http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
Appreciate help/pointer on this.
Thanks in Advance.
--
BR,
Atul Thosar
RE: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Vladimir Loubenski <vl...@opentext.com>.
Hi everybody,
I built Xerces 3.1.2 with ICU 3.4 and it seems work OK.
Do somebody see problems with this combination?
Thank you,
Vladimir Loubenski.
From: thosaratul41@gmail.com [mailto:thosaratul41@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Atul Thosar
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 3:01 PM
To: c-users@xerces.apache.org
Cc: c-dev@xerces.apache.org
Subject: Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Ohhh, gr8 :-). Thanks Aleksey.
--
BR,
Atul Thosar
On 16 July 2015 at 22:44, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com>> wrote:
yes, 54.
55 It works too
Aleksey Dobrunov
2015-07-16 22:08 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>>:
> Thanks Aleksey for the response. I believe you mean to say version 54 and
> not 5.4, correct?
>
> --
>
>
> BR,
> Atul Thosar
>
>
>
>
> On 16 July 2015 at 18:50, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>> I used version 5.4. It worked well.
>>
>>
>> Aleksey Dobrunov
>>
>>
>> 2015-07-16 17:18 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>>:
>> > Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
>> >
>> > --
>> > BR,
>> > Atul Thosar
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's
>> latest
>> >> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
>> >> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
>> >>
>> >> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
>> >> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in Advance.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> BR,
>> >> Atul Thosar
>> >>
>> >>
>>
Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>.
Ohhh, gr8 :-). Thanks Aleksey.
--
BR,
Atul Thosar
On 16 July 2015 at 22:44, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes, 54.
> 55 It works too
>
> Aleksey Dobrunov
>
> 2015-07-16 22:08 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
> > Thanks Aleksey for the response. I believe you mean to say version 54 and
> > not 5.4, correct?
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > BR,
> > Atul Thosar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 16 July 2015 at 18:50, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >> I used version 5.4. It worked well.
> >>
> >>
> >> Aleksey Dobrunov
> >>
> >>
> >> 2015-07-16 17:18 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > BR,
> >> > Atul Thosar
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi All,
> >> >>
> >> >> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's
> >> latest
> >> >> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
> >> >> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
> >> >>
> >> >> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
> >> >> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks in Advance.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> BR,
> >> >> Atul Thosar
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>.
Ohhh, gr8 :-). Thanks Aleksey.
--
BR,
Atul Thosar
On 16 July 2015 at 22:44, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes, 54.
> 55 It works too
>
> Aleksey Dobrunov
>
> 2015-07-16 22:08 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
> > Thanks Aleksey for the response. I believe you mean to say version 54 and
> > not 5.4, correct?
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > BR,
> > Atul Thosar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 16 July 2015 at 18:50, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >> I used version 5.4. It worked well.
> >>
> >>
> >> Aleksey Dobrunov
> >>
> >>
> >> 2015-07-16 17:18 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > BR,
> >> > Atul Thosar
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi All,
> >> >>
> >> >> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's
> >> latest
> >> >> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
> >> >> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
> >> >>
> >> >> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
> >> >> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks in Advance.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> BR,
> >> >> Atul Thosar
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com>.
yes, 54.
55 It works too
Aleksey Dobrunov
2015-07-16 22:08 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks Aleksey for the response. I believe you mean to say version 54 and
> not 5.4, correct?
>
> --
>
>
> BR,
> Atul Thosar
>
>
>
>
> On 16 July 2015 at 18:50, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>> I used version 5.4. It worked well.
>>
>>
>> Aleksey Dobrunov
>>
>>
>> 2015-07-16 17:18 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
>> > Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
>> >
>> > --
>> > BR,
>> > Atul Thosar
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's
>> latest
>> >> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
>> >> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
>> >>
>> >> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
>> >> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in Advance.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> BR,
>> >> Atul Thosar
>> >>
>> >>
>>
Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Aleksey for the response. I believe you mean to say version 54 and
not 5.4, correct?
--
BR,
Atul Thosar
On 16 July 2015 at 18:50, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
> I used version 5.4. It worked well.
>
>
> Aleksey Dobrunov
>
>
> 2015-07-16 17:18 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
> > Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
> >
> > --
> > BR,
> > Atul Thosar
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's
> latest
> >> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
> >> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
> >>
> >> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
> >> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
> >>
> >>
> >> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks in Advance.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Atul Thosar
> >>
> >>
>
Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Aleksey for the response. I believe you mean to say version 54 and
not 5.4, correct?
--
BR,
Atul Thosar
On 16 July 2015 at 18:50, Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
> I used version 5.4. It worked well.
>
>
> Aleksey Dobrunov
>
>
> 2015-07-16 17:18 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
> > Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
> >
> > --
> > BR,
> > Atul Thosar
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's
> latest
> >> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
> >> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
> >>
> >> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
> >> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
> >>
> >>
> >> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks in Advance.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Atul Thosar
> >>
> >>
>
Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Aleksey Dobrunov <ct...@gmail.com>.
Hi.
I used version 5.4. It worked well.
Aleksey Dobrunov
2015-07-16 17:18 GMT+05:00 Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>:
> Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
>
> --
> BR,
> Atul Thosar
>
>
>
> On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's latest
>> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
>> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
>>
>> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
>> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
>>
>>
>> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
>>
>>
>> Thanks in Advance.
>>
>> --
>>
>> BR,
>> Atul Thosar
>>
>>
Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>.
Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
--
BR,
Atul Thosar
On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's latest
> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
>
> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
>
>
> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
>
>
> Thanks in Advance.
>
> --
>
> BR,
> Atul Thosar
>
>
Re: Possible best match of Xerces w/ ICU
Posted by Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com>.
Gentle Reminder All. Any help/pointer?
--
BR,
Atul Thosar
On 10 July 2015 at 16:35, Atul Thosar <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Has anyone tried building and using Xerxes 3.1.x release with ICU's latest
> release? 55.x or may be 44.x? Or any guideline which ICU release is
> compatible w/ Xerces 3.1.x release.
>
> I searched mailing list archived, but do not found anything concrete
> except http://marc.info/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=133516390513773&w=2
>
>
> Appreciate help/pointer on this.
>
>
> Thanks in Advance.
>
> --
>
> BR,
> Atul Thosar
>
>