[jira] [Resolved] (ARTEMIS-3695) use specific jetty dependencies instead of jetty-all

["Robbie Gemmell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Robbie Gemmell resolved ARTEMIS-3695.
-------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 2.21.0
         Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
       Resolution: Fixed

> use specific jetty dependencies instead of jetty-all
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-3695
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3695
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 2.20.0
>            Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>            Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.21.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The build using the 'jetty-all' modules "uber" classified jar as a dependency in numerous places. This dependency unfortunately also passes on all its component dependencies of the individual jetty modules it includes, thus meaning all the artemis modules using it also have the effective duplicate dependencies (though for the resulting downloadable distribution archive, only the uber jar is actually packaged in the end tar, due to some specific filtering used, e.g [1][2]).
> The Jetty folks say this artifact was not intended for users and shouldnt be used, https://www.eclipse.org//lists/jetty-users/msg06029.html.
> It has also already been removed in Jetty 10(/11) so this would also impede upgrading to those newer releases [3].
> The build should just depend on the invididual Jetty bits it needs in each area. 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/ee52e3de7c5edb65ee0df463a17387672425b2ba/artemis-distribution/src/main/assembly/dep.xml#L39
> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/ee52e3de7c5edb65ee0df463a17387672425b2ba/artemis-distribution/src/main/assembly/dep.xml#L50-L52
> [3] [https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/5317]
>  
> (A first step might just be to depend on all the individual bits that jetty-all already does, and which the various modules using jetty-all are thus in turn already getting. Then afterwards they could be rationalised to only depend on the bits truly being used by each area).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)