You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Mark Silva <ms...@authenex.com> on 2003/05/02 22:52:49 UTC

jk vs jk2

what advantage does jk2 have over jk for IIS and Apache to Tomcat redirection?  Does it provide any additional features?  

we are wondering if we should move from jk to jk2.

thanks,
mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

RE: jk vs jk2

Posted by Chris Book <cs...@uwaterloo.ca>.
I've had nothing but problems with jk2.  Jk works great.
If you're going to switch, I'd suggest testing it out with a heavy load to
make sure it doesn't crash.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Silva [mailto:msilva@authenex.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: jk vs jk2


what advantage does jk2 have over jk for IIS and Apache to Tomcat
redirection?  Does it provide any additional features?

we are wondering if we should move from jk to jk2.

thanks,
mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org