You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by "Wilson, Wayne" <ww...@ettain.com> on 2001/12/18 19:21:34 UTC
Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0
Hi,
Because of some deadlock bugs in Tomcat 3.2.3 that we are experiencing (891,
1006 & 1798), we are going to have to switch to either Tomcat 3.3 or 4.X.
What do people think about the stability of each of these versions? We will
be running this on W2K in conjunction with JBoss and because we need load
balancing we will be using mod_jk.
What do you think?
--Wayne
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0: TELL US NOVICES WHAT IS GOING ON
Posted by Micael Padraig Og mac Grene <ca...@harbornet.com>.
At 01:13 PM 12/18/01 -0800, you wrote:
>Unfortunately, Tomcat 4.x doesn't support load-balancing, yet -- even with
>mod_jk. So, if you need it, you should stick with 3.3.
>
>Thanks,
>--jeff
What is going on with 3.3 and 4.0? Are there two camps in Tomcat? Is
there a battle to see which is going to win? Why is 4.0 an extension of
3.2 and what is 3.3 all about? I need to know what the plans are in order
to make some significant decisions. Can someone tell me what is happening,
or direct me to a place to find out? Thanks.
Micael
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0
Posted by Jeff Kilbride <je...@kilbride.com>.
Unfortunately, Tomcat 4.x doesn't support load-balancing, yet -- even with
mod_jk. So, if you need it, you should stick with 3.3.
Thanks,
--jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hunter Hillegas" <li...@lastonepicked.com>
To: "Tomcat User List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0
> I would suggest Tomcat 4.0 because it is integrated into Jboss which gives
> you a MAJOR speed up between the servlet layer and the Jboss layer. Major
> speed up.
>
> > From: "Wilson, Wayne" <ww...@ettain.com>
> > Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:21:34 -0500
> > To: "Tomcat Users List (E-mail)" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Subject: Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Because of some deadlock bugs in Tomcat 3.2.3 that we are experiencing
(891,
> > 1006 & 1798), we are going to have to switch to either Tomcat 3.3 or
4.X.
> > What do people think about the stability of each of these versions? We
will
> > be running this on W2K in conjunction with JBoss and because we need
load
> > balancing we will be using mod_jk.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > --Wayne
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0
Posted by Hunter Hillegas <li...@lastonepicked.com>.
I would suggest Tomcat 4.0 because it is integrated into Jboss which gives
you a MAJOR speed up between the servlet layer and the Jboss layer. Major
speed up.
> From: "Wilson, Wayne" <ww...@ettain.com>
> Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:21:34 -0500
> To: "Tomcat Users List (E-mail)" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0
>
> Hi,
>
> Because of some deadlock bugs in Tomcat 3.2.3 that we are experiencing (891,
> 1006 & 1798), we are going to have to switch to either Tomcat 3.3 or 4.X.
> What do people think about the stability of each of these versions? We will
> be running this on W2K in conjunction with JBoss and because we need load
> balancing we will be using mod_jk.
>
> What do you think?
>
> --Wayne
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>