[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1255) CheckIndex should allow term position = -1

["Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987052#action_12987052 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1255:
---------------------------------------

Fix reverted and corrected to disallow negative posIncr in LUCENE-1542.

> CheckIndex should allow term position = -1
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1255
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1255
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.3.2, 2.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1255.patch, LUCENE-1255.take2.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from this discussion:
>     http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200803.mbox/%3CPine.LNX.4.62.0803292323350.16762@radix.cryptio.net%3E
> Right now CheckIndex claims the index is corrupt if you index a Token with -1 position, which happens if your first token has positionIncrementGap set to 0.
> But, as far as I can tell, Lucene doesn't "mind" when this happens.
> So I plan to fix CheckIndex to allow this case.  I'll backport to 2.3.2 as well.
> LUCENE-1253 is one example where Lucene's core analyzers could do this.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org