You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> on 2008/08/29 18:28:21 UTC
Re: svn commit: r690310 - /continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/
I don't understand here.
This branch is for the 1.2 release or for 1.2.1 ?
--
Olivier
2008/8/29 <ws...@apache.org>:
> Author: wsmoak
> Date: Fri Aug 29 09:09:34 2008
> New Revision: 690310
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690310&view=rev
> Log:
> Branch for Continuum 1.2 at r689851
>
> Added:
> continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/
> - copied from r689851, continuum/trunk/
>
>
Re: svn commit: r690310 - /continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
Commit them to trunk and merge them back? Trunk hasn't changed.
I don't like maintaining branches either, but I like releases being
blocked by snapshot dependencies even less.
To allow people to develop against snapshots of other projects, and
still be able to release, somebody has to be on a branch. I
volunteer. :)
--
Wendy
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok.
> Nice I have some more jobs to commit my local changes to this new branch :-(.
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2008/8/29 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
>> It's intended for the 1.2.x series. (It looks like trunk will move on
>> with 1.3 or 2.0.)
>>
>> I followed up the Versioning Continuum releases thread with my
>> thoughts. We can always change it if I'm way off base. :)
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I don't understand here.
>>> This branch is for the 1.2 release or for 1.2.1 ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>> 2008/8/29 <ws...@apache.org>:
>>>> Author: wsmoak
>>>> Date: Fri Aug 29 09:09:34 2008
>>>> New Revision: 690310
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690310&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Branch for Continuum 1.2 at r689851
>>>>
>>>> Added:
>>>> continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/
>>>> - copied from r689851, continuum/trunk/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: svn commit: r690310 - /continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Ok.
Nice I have some more jobs to commit my local changes to this new branch :-(.
--
Olivier
2008/8/29 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> It's intended for the 1.2.x series. (It looks like trunk will move on
> with 1.3 or 2.0.)
>
> I followed up the Versioning Continuum releases thread with my
> thoughts. We can always change it if I'm way off base. :)
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I don't understand here.
>> This branch is for the 1.2 release or for 1.2.1 ?
>>
>> --
>> Olivier
>>
>> 2008/8/29 <ws...@apache.org>:
>>> Author: wsmoak
>>> Date: Fri Aug 29 09:09:34 2008
>>> New Revision: 690310
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690310&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Branch for Continuum 1.2 at r689851
>>>
>>> Added:
>>> continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/
>>> - copied from r689851, continuum/trunk/
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: svn commit: r690310 - /continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
It's intended for the 1.2.x series. (It looks like trunk will move on
with 1.3 or 2.0.)
I followed up the Versioning Continuum releases thread with my
thoughts. We can always change it if I'm way off base. :)
--
Wendy
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> I don't understand here.
> This branch is for the 1.2 release or for 1.2.1 ?
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2008/8/29 <ws...@apache.org>:
>> Author: wsmoak
>> Date: Fri Aug 29 09:09:34 2008
>> New Revision: 690310
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690310&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Branch for Continuum 1.2 at r689851
>>
>> Added:
>> continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/
>> - copied from r689851, continuum/trunk/
>>
>>
>