You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by radai <ra...@gmail.com> on 2019/12/12 19:35:14 UTC

Re: [VOTE] KIP-514 Add a bounded flush() API to Kafka Producer

so can we call this passed ?

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:43 AM Satish Duggana <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:58 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:33 PM radai <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like to initiate a vote on KIP-514.
> > >
> > > links:
> > > the kip -
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-514%3A+Add+a+bounded+flush%28%29+API+to+Kafka+Producer
> > > the PR - https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7569
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-514 Add a bounded flush() API to Kafka Producer

Posted by KUN DU <du...@gmail.com>.
Rebased the PR based on latest trunk, can we merge the PR?

Kun

radai <ra...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月13日周五 上午9:26写道:

> i also have a PR :-)
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7569
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:50 PM Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > You got 3 binding votes (Joel, Harsha, Ismael) - the vote passed on Nov
> 7.
> >
> > Happy hacking!
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:35 AM radai <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > so can we call this passed ?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:43 AM Satish Duggana <
> satish.duggana@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:58 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:33 PM radai <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to initiate a vote on KIP-514.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > links:
> > > > > > the kip -
> > > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-514%3A+Add+a+bounded+flush%28%29+API+to+Kafka+Producer
> > > > > > the PR - https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7569
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you
> > > > > >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-514 Add a bounded flush() API to Kafka Producer

Posted by radai <ra...@gmail.com>.
i also have a PR :-)
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7569

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:50 PM Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> You got 3 binding votes (Joel, Harsha, Ismael) - the vote passed on Nov 7.
>
> Happy hacking!
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:35 AM radai <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > so can we call this passed ?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:43 AM Satish Duggana <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:58 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:33 PM radai <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to initiate a vote on KIP-514.
> > > > >
> > > > > links:
> > > > > the kip -
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-514%3A+Add+a+bounded+flush%28%29+API+to+Kafka+Producer
> > > > > the PR - https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7569
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you
> > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-514 Add a bounded flush() API to Kafka Producer

Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>.
You got 3 binding votes (Joel, Harsha, Ismael) - the vote passed on Nov 7.

Happy hacking!

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:35 AM radai <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> so can we call this passed ?
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:43 AM Satish Duggana <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:58 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:33 PM radai <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to initiate a vote on KIP-514.
> > > >
> > > > links:
> > > > the kip -
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-514%3A+Add+a+bounded+flush%28%29+API+to+Kafka+Producer
> > > > the PR - https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7569
> > > >
> > > > Thank you
> > > >