You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org by Zach Hoffman <za...@zrhoffman.net> on 2020/07/08 18:57:44 UTC

Re: Jenkins Jobs container order

With #4836 merged, the only Jenkins jobs that weasel needs to be removed
from are https://builds.apache.org/job/trafficcontrol-PR/ and
https://builds.apache.org/job/trafficcontrol-master-build/ , right?

-Zach

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:16 AM ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's a PR open to handle this by running Weasel in GH Actions instead:
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/4836
>
> After that, though, it would still need to be removed from Jenkins.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:56 AM Chris Lemmons <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, there's basically no reliable way to have weasel return reliable
> > results with a filesystem changing significantly out from under it
> > while it runs. It's possible to reduce the size of the race
> > conditions, but not to remove the race conditions.
> >
> > The best solution is probably to run weasel first or last in the build
> > if you want to run against the same build root, or to run against a
> > separate directory checkout if you're running in parallel.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:54 PM Zach Hoffman <za...@zrhoffman.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah that would work. Weasel would show up as a separate checkmark or
> > "X",
> > > so it would be easier to tell when weasel failed or not. If a single
> > check
> > > fails, we get the "X", so it would be hard to miss.
> > >
> > > -Zach
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:49 PM ocket 8888 <oc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Alternatively it's trivial to run weasel in a GH Action, which would
> be
> > > > totally independent of whatever's happening in Jenkins.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:24 AM Zach Hoffman <za...@zrhoffman.net>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey ATC,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can we change the CI jobs (
> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/search/?q=trafficcontrol) to run weasel
> > after
> > > > > the
> > > > > other containers exit?
> > > > >
> > > > > When running against
> > https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/4758
> > > > ,
> > > > > weasel fails because it references files that existed when it
> > started but
> > > > > had since been deleted. Example (search for panic: Failed when
> > > > enumerating
> > > > > working directory):
> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/trafficcontrol-PR/6173/consoleText
> > > > >
> > > > > After speaking to the author of comcast/weasel (alficles), it
> sounds
> > like
> > > > > the problem exists in golang's filesystem walker itself, so a fix
> > would
> > > > > involve rewriting that library and would be easier to just avoid.
> To
> > > > avoid
> > > > > the issue, the non-weasel containers would run before weasel to
> > avoid the
> > > > > filesystem changing while weasel runs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this doable? The PR job seems to consistently fail for
> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/trafficcontrol-PR/6173/consoleText
> > ,so it
> > > > > should not be merged until the CI jobs are changed to accommodate
> > weasel.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Zach
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>