You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2010/02/10 11:59:19 UTC
Fwd: [1539-ProjectStageSystemProperty] PROPOSAL
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ed Burns <Ed...@sun.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM
Subject: [1539-ProjectStageSystemProperty] PROPOSAL
To: dev@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
PROPOSAL
This will *not* go in the spec, but I propose that existing JSF
implementation coordinate and implement the following behavior.
We introduce a System Property
faces.PROJECT_STAGE
Rationale for using this name: the context-param for this property is
"javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE". I chose not to use the "javax." prefix
because doing so would be in poor taste. The "javax." prefix is
intended for things in the specification proper.
The valid values of this property are exactly as specified in section
11.1.3. If the System Property is not one of the valid values, the
other sources for a value for this property are consulted.
The implementation will interpret this property as an override for all
other ways of setting the Application.getProjectStage() property.
In addition to the preceding proposal, the implementation will print out
a very prominent log message such as:
********************************************************************
*** WARNING: JavaServer Faces is running in DEVELOPMENT mode. ***
*** ^^^^^^^^^^^ ***
*** Do NOT deploy to your live server(s) without changing this. ***
*** See Application#getProjectStage() for more information. ***
********************************************************************
Matthias Wessendorf, can you ensure that MyFaces implements it this way?
Ed
--
| ed.burns@sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: Fwd: [1539-ProjectStageSystemProperty] PROPOSAL
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
cool!
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> txs also fixed in CODI [1]
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> [1] http://github.com/struberg/myfaces-ext-cdi/
>
> --- Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> schrieb am Mi, 10.2.2010:
>
>> Von: Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>> Betreff: Fwd: [1539-ProjectStageSystemProperty] PROPOSAL
>> An: "MyFaces Development" <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>> Datum: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010, 11:59
>> FYI
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Ed Burns <Ed...@sun.com>
>> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM
>> Subject: [1539-ProjectStageSystemProperty] PROPOSAL
>> To: dev@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>> PROPOSAL
>>
>> This will *not* go in the spec, but I propose that existing
>> JSF
>> implementation coordinate and implement the following
>> behavior.
>>
>> We introduce a System Property
>>
>> faces.PROJECT_STAGE
>>
>> Rationale for using this name: the context-param for this
>> property is
>> "javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE". I chose not to use the
>> "javax." prefix
>> because doing so would be in poor taste. The "javax."
>> prefix is
>> intended for things in the specification proper.
>>
>> The valid values of this property are exactly as
>> specified in section
>> 11.1.3. If the System Property is not one of the valid
>> values, the
>> other sources for a value for this property are
>> consulted.
>>
>> The implementation will interpret this property as an
>> override for all
>> other ways of setting the Application.getProjectStage()
>> property.
>>
>> In addition to the preceding proposal, the implementation
>> will print out
>> a very prominent log message such as:
>>
>> ********************************************************************
>> *** WARNING: JavaServer Faces is running in DEVELOPMENT
>> mode. ***
>> ***
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^ ***
>> *** Do NOT deploy to your live server(s) without changing
>> this. ***
>> *** See Application#getProjectStage() for more information.
>> ***
>> ********************************************************************
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf, can you ensure that MyFaces implements
>> it this way?
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>> --
>> | ed.burns@sun.com
>> | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
>> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
AW: Fwd: [1539-ProjectStageSystemProperty] PROPOSAL
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
txs also fixed in CODI [1]
LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://github.com/struberg/myfaces-ext-cdi/
--- Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> schrieb am Mi, 10.2.2010:
> Von: Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> Betreff: Fwd: [1539-ProjectStageSystemProperty] PROPOSAL
> An: "MyFaces Development" <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
> Datum: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010, 11:59
> FYI
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ed Burns <Ed...@sun.com>
> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM
> Subject: [1539-ProjectStageSystemProperty] PROPOSAL
> To: dev@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>
>
> PROPOSAL
>
> This will *not* go in the spec, but I propose that existing
> JSF
> implementation coordinate and implement the following
> behavior.
>
> We introduce a System Property
>
> faces.PROJECT_STAGE
>
> Rationale for using this name: the context-param for this
> property is
> "javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE". I chose not to use the
> "javax." prefix
> because doing so would be in poor taste. The "javax."
> prefix is
> intended for things in the specification proper.
>
> The valid values of this property are exactly as
> specified in section
> 11.1.3. If the System Property is not one of the valid
> values, the
> other sources for a value for this property are
> consulted.
>
> The implementation will interpret this property as an
> override for all
> other ways of setting the Application.getProjectStage()
> property.
>
> In addition to the preceding proposal, the implementation
> will print out
> a very prominent log message such as:
>
> ********************************************************************
> *** WARNING: JavaServer Faces is running in DEVELOPMENT
> mode. ***
> ***
> ^^^^^^^^^^^ ***
> *** Do NOT deploy to your live server(s) without changing
> this. ***
> *** See Application#getProjectStage() for more information.
> ***
> ********************************************************************
>
> Matthias Wessendorf, can you ensure that MyFaces implements
> it this way?
>
> Ed
>
>
> --
> | ed.burns@sun.com
> | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com