You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> on 2006/08/08 12:25:06 UTC
Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be
> usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1].
>
We need to make sure that DRLVM is ready first, although looking at the
the patch, I'm not sure there's much to be done. Worrysome, given the
boot classpath property.
I am in the process of running for a plane. (There's news...) Can
someone verify that there will be no problem w/ DRLVM before we do this?
> Can other VM folk let me know if/when they are comfortable with that
> patch being applied? The contents were described by Oliver, and the
> patch file is short enough to read.
>
> The only potential breakages I see for you are the renaming of a system
> property, and the launcher looking for a different DLL name.
Right - that was my worry, the system property, but I didn't find that
on first pass.
The launcher change is irrelevant for now, since there are other issues
that need to be fixed w/ DRLVM before it works properly w/ the launcher,
where "properly" is defined as "having all the DRLVM artifacts in a
/default or other subdirectory of jre/bin" :)
geir
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> [1] http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
On 8 August 2006 at 12:26, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> > The launcher changes wouldn't affect DRLVM, and it seems like the
> > com.ibm.oti -> org.apache.harmony wouldn't either, strangely...
>
> Must be using it's own equivalent property.
>
> And generating 5.0 classfiles is ok, right?
>
> So are we good to go?
Well, I can run HelloWorld on a drlvm using a 5.0-patched classlib. So
I'd say we should go for it.
-Mark.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> The launcher changes wouldn't affect DRLVM, and it seems like the
> com.ibm.oti -> org.apache.harmony wouldn't either, strangely...
Must be using it's own equivalent property.
And generating 5.0 classfiles is ok, right?
So are we good to go?
Tim
> geir
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>>> Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be
>>>> usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1].
>>>>
>>> We need to make sure that DRLVM is ready first, although looking at the
>>> the patch, I'm not sure there's much to be done.
>> Right, that's why I put out the call.
>>
>>> Worrysome, given the boot classpath property.
>>>
>>> I am in the process of running for a plane. (There's news...) Can
>>> someone verify that there will be no problem w/ DRLVM before we do this?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Can other VM folk let me know if/when they are comfortable with that
>>>> patch being applied? The contents were described by Oliver, and the
>>>> patch file is short enough to read.
>>>>
>>>> The only potential breakages I see for you are the renaming of a system
>>>> property, and the launcher looking for a different DLL name.
>>> Right - that was my worry, the system property, but I didn't find that
>>> on first pass.
>>>
>>> The launcher change is irrelevant for now, since there are other issues
>>> that need to be fixed w/ DRLVM before it works properly w/ the launcher,
>>> where "properly" is defined as "having all the DRLVM artifacts in a
>>> /default or other subdirectory of jre/bin" :)
>> Yep. Just want to ensure the *current* VM states are not regressed by
>> applying the patch -- we all agree there is more work to be done.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony/index.html
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
The launcher changes wouldn't affect DRLVM, and it seems like the
com.ibm.oti -> org.apache.harmony wouldn't either, strangely...
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be
>>> usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1].
>>>
>> We need to make sure that DRLVM is ready first, although looking at the
>> the patch, I'm not sure there's much to be done.
>
> Right, that's why I put out the call.
>
>> Worrysome, given the boot classpath property.
>>
>> I am in the process of running for a plane. (There's news...) Can
>> someone verify that there will be no problem w/ DRLVM before we do this?
>>
>>
>>> Can other VM folk let me know if/when they are comfortable with that
>>> patch being applied? The contents were described by Oliver, and the
>>> patch file is short enough to read.
>>>
>>> The only potential breakages I see for you are the renaming of a system
>>> property, and the launcher looking for a different DLL name.
>> Right - that was my worry, the system property, but I didn't find that
>> on first pass.
>>
>> The launcher change is irrelevant for now, since there are other issues
>> that need to be fixed w/ DRLVM before it works properly w/ the launcher,
>> where "properly" is defined as "having all the DRLVM artifacts in a
>> /default or other subdirectory of jre/bin" :)
>
> Yep. Just want to ensure the *current* VM states are not regressed by
> applying the patch -- we all agree there is more work to be done.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>> geir
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony/index.html
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [classlib] Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be
>> usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1].
>>
>
> We need to make sure that DRLVM is ready first, although looking at the
> the patch, I'm not sure there's much to be done.
Right, that's why I put out the call.
> Worrysome, given the boot classpath property.
>
> I am in the process of running for a plane. (There's news...) Can
> someone verify that there will be no problem w/ DRLVM before we do this?
>
>
>> Can other VM folk let me know if/when they are comfortable with that
>> patch being applied? The contents were described by Oliver, and the
>> patch file is short enough to read.
>>
>> The only potential breakages I see for you are the renaming of a system
>> property, and the launcher looking for a different DLL name.
>
> Right - that was my worry, the system property, but I didn't find that
> on first pass.
>
> The launcher change is irrelevant for now, since there are other issues
> that need to be fixed w/ DRLVM before it works properly w/ the launcher,
> where "properly" is defined as "having all the DRLVM artifacts in a
> /default or other subdirectory of jre/bin" :)
Yep. Just want to ensure the *current* VM states are not regressed by
applying the patch -- we all agree there is more work to be done.
Regards,
Tim
> geir
>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony/index.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org