You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@community.apache.org by Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com> on 2015/02/10 09:38:16 UTC
Proposed Track Details for Apachecon NA
Hi All
Pierre and I have been managing the OFBiz track for our community. We
have reviewed the OFBiz submissions and as requested have prepared a
provisional track. I've updated the wiki
https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ACNA2015ContentCommittee with the details.
Thanks
Sharan
Re: Proposed Track Details for Apachecon NA
Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/10/2015 09:14 AM, jan i wrote:
>
>>
>> I agree with Rich, but before this turns into (once again) too many
>> variations over the same theme, can we agree on ONE common way to keep the
>> trakcs together.
>>
>> I am happy to be the one that coordinates and updates the track schedule
>> with input from all of you. But of course we can also do it the usual way
>> that everybody does everyrhing.
>>
>> just my 2ct.
>> rgds
>> jan i
>>
>> ps. Do not misunderstand me, you guys (including Ross) does a brilliant
>> job
>> in track building, I justthink we need some coordination. Rick will surely
>> tell me if I interfere wongly in the process.
>>
>> >
>>>
>>
>
> C. Craig Ross <cc...@linuxfoundation.org> is maintaining the One True
> Spreadsheet, because he's going to be the one that does the final online
> schedule, printed schedule, speaker notifications, and so on. He has shared
> that spreadsheet with me, and can also share it with you if you like, but
> I'm not making any edits there - just funneling information to Craig.
he has shared with me as well, but I agree with you, no edits just tunnel
information. I need it for TAC later to schedule which applicants cover
which talks.
> I would like to have something more efficient, more interractive, and
> easier to use, but I don't want to end up with the fiasco and confusion
> that we've had for the last two events.
+1 no 3 day total stress this time please.
>
> I'm open to any suggestion, but we need to be sure that we keep Craig in
> the loop for any decisions in this area, since he is ultimately responsible
> for session scheduling for this event, and we don't want to further
> complicate things.
+1, let us follow the riad of letting Craig do the work.
we just need to find a way of how to get all the tracks scheduled not in
the hands of you, pierre and ross. And not forgetting accepting/rejecting
all these talks, which is something I supoose Craig will have a hard time
doing.
rgds
jan i
>
> This is why I have not made my own copy of the data anywhere, other than
> "my" track, which I'm coordinating in a doc that I'll turn back over to
> Craig as soon as it solidifies.
>
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Re: Proposed Track Details for Apachecon NA
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On 02/10/2015 09:14 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> I agree with Rich, but before this turns into (once again) too many
> variations over the same theme, can we agree on ONE common way to keep the
> trakcs together.
>
> I am happy to be the one that coordinates and updates the track schedule
> with input from all of you. But of course we can also do it the usual way
> that everybody does everyrhing.
>
> just my 2ct.
> rgds
> jan i
>
> ps. Do not misunderstand me, you guys (including Ross) does a brilliant job
> in track building, I justthink we need some coordination. Rick will surely
> tell me if I interfere wongly in the process.
>
>> >
C. Craig Ross <cc...@linuxfoundation.org> is maintaining the One True
Spreadsheet, because he's going to be the one that does the final online
schedule, printed schedule, speaker notifications, and so on. He has
shared that spreadsheet with me, and can also share it with you if you
like, but I'm not making any edits there - just funneling information to
Craig.
I would like to have something more efficient, more interractive, and
easier to use, but I don't want to end up with the fiasco and confusion
that we've had for the last two events.
I'm open to any suggestion, but we need to be sure that we keep Craig in
the loop for any decisions in this area, since he is ultimately
responsible for session scheduling for this event, and we don't want to
further complicate things.
This is why I have not made my own copy of the data anywhere, other than
"my" track, which I'm coordinating in a doc that I'll turn back over to
Craig as soon as it solidifies.
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: Proposed Track Details for Apachecon NA
Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/10/2015 03:38 AM, Sharan Foga wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> Pierre and I have been managing the OFBiz track for our community. We
>> have reviewed the OFBiz submissions and as requested have prepared a
>> provisional track. I've updated the wiki
>> https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ACNA2015ContentCommittee with the
>> details.
>>
>
>
> Thank you so much for this. If you could add the CFP URL for each talk
> next to it, that will greatly facilitate getting these talks marked
> correctly in the CFP system, which, in turn, facilitates things like
> speaker notifications, producing the online schedule, and so on.
I agree with Rich, but before this turns into (once again) too many
variations over the same theme, can we agree on ONE common way to keep the
trakcs together.
I am happy to be the one that coordinates and updates the track schedule
with input from all of you. But of course we can also do it the usual way
that everybody does everyrhing.
just my 2ct.
rgds
jan i
ps. Do not misunderstand me, you guys (including Ross) does a brilliant job
in track building, I justthink we need some coordination. Rick will surely
tell me if I interfere wongly in the process.
>
>
> --Rich
>
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
> Join us on #apachecon on Freenode
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Re: Proposed Track Details for Apachecon NA
Posted by Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Rich
CFP URLs have been added.
Thanks
Sharan
On 10.2.2015 14:58, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 02/10/2015 03:38 AM, Sharan Foga wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> Pierre and I have been managing the OFBiz track for our community. We
>> have reviewed the OFBiz submissions and as requested have prepared a
>> provisional track. I've updated the wiki
>> https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ACNA2015ContentCommittee with the
>> details.
>
>
> Thank you so much for this. If you could add the CFP URL for each talk
> next to it, that will greatly facilitate getting these talks marked
> correctly in the CFP system, which, in turn, facilitates things like
> speaker notifications, producing the online schedule, and so on.
>
>
> --Rich
>
>
Re: Proposed Track Details for Apachecon NA
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On 02/10/2015 03:38 AM, Sharan Foga wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Pierre and I have been managing the OFBiz track for our community. We
> have reviewed the OFBiz submissions and as requested have prepared a
> provisional track. I've updated the wiki
> https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ACNA2015ContentCommittee with the
> details.
Thank you so much for this. If you could add the CFP URL for each talk
next to it, that will greatly facilitate getting these talks marked
correctly in the CFP system, which, in turn, facilitates things like
speaker notifications, producing the online schedule, and so on.
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Join us on #apachecon on Freenode
Re: Proposed Track Details for Apachecon NA
Posted by jan i <ja...@apache.org>.
On 10 February 2015 at 09:38, Sharan Foga <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Pierre and I have been managing the OFBiz track for our community. We have
> reviewed the OFBiz submissions and as requested have prepared a provisional
> track. I've updated the wiki
> https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ACNA2015ContentCommittee with the
> details.
>
Looks quite good to me, thanks for the work.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>