You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Daniel Pravat <dp...@outlook.com> on 2016/03/01 23:08:07 UTC

Re: Review Request 40939: Stout: Marked `os::su` as deleted on Windows.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated March 1, 2016, 10:08 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Alex Naparu, Alex Clemmer, and M Lawindi.


Summary (updated)
-----------------

Stout: Marked `os::su` as deleted on Windows.


Bugs: MESOS-4780
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4780


Repository: mesos


Description (updated)
-------

Stout: Marked `os::su` as deleted on Windows.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am 03eff5a831283f6d298e9a1feecfdc7369cacfe7 
  3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp f1d38029eef7e89dfdb8915158fba17865e6855b 
  3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/su.hpp PRE-CREATION 
  3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/su.hpp PRE-CREATION 
  3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/su.hpp PRE-CREATION 
  3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp 84a2a021859d4e5c8547ad2a509eebda428a8255 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/diff/


Testing
-------

OSX: make check
Windows: make.bat


Thanks,

Daniel Pravat


Re: Review Request 40939: Stout: Marked `os::su` as deleted on Windows.

Posted by Joris Van Remoortere <jo...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/#review121519
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!




verified nothing changed in the posix implementation.


3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am (line 117)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/#comment183229>

    style



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/su.hpp (lines 28 - 29)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/#comment183236>

    why the extra new line?



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/su.hpp (line 216)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/#comment183237>

    no extra new-line



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/su.hpp (lines 20 - 24)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/#comment183231>

    Why does this file need to include these?



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/su.hpp (lines 46 - 56)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/#comment183239>

    2 new lines between functions in a namespace.


- Joris Van Remoortere


On March 1, 2016, 10:08 p.m., Daniel Pravat wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 1, 2016, 10:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alex Naparu, Alex Clemmer, and M Lawindi.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4780
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4780
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Stout: Marked `os::su` as deleted on Windows.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am 03eff5a831283f6d298e9a1feecfdc7369cacfe7 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp f1d38029eef7e89dfdb8915158fba17865e6855b 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/su.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/su.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/su.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/posix/os.hpp 84a2a021859d4e5c8547ad2a509eebda428a8255 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40939/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> OSX: make check
> Windows: make.bat
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel Pravat
> 
>