[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1834) suffix added to component id when including files

["Stanislav Sabol (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719953#action_12719953 ] 

Stanislav Sabol commented on MYFACES-1834:
------------------------------------------

Please, any progress on this bug? I understand this is a one year bug but I disagree that there is one failure case (combination of c:forEach and jsp:include). 

> suffix added to component id when including files
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MYFACES-1834
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1834
>             Project: MyFaces Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JSR-252
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.2
>            Reporter: Simon Kitching
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In core 1.2 to 1.2.2, any use of jsp:include causes the ids of components in the included file to have a random string appended to them.
> This results in some ugly ids. However more significantly, the id of a component is not predictable even when an id attribute is explicitly assigned.
> In addition, this breaks the tomahawk forceId feature, because although the namespace prefix is omitted the rest of the id changes making "forceId" useless.
> The cause is class UIComponentClassicTagBase, where checkIfItIsInAnIterator() returns true if the current component is in an included or forwarded page. Later, the createUniqueId method adds a suffix to the user-specified if member isInAnIterator is true.
> Unfortunately, documentation on why things are implemented as they are is lacking.
> Checking for iteration is needed to support
>   <c:forEach ..>
>    <h:inputText id="name"/>
>   </c:forEach>
> Checking for includedOrForwarded might be to allow:
>     <jsp:include page="subPage.jsp" />
>     <jsp:include page="subPage.jsp" />
> However this is a very rare usage; support for this should not hurt everyone.
> And Sun Mojarra does *not* mess with the ids like this...testing shows
> that the ids of components are the same regardless of whether they are
> inline or in an included file.
> Maybe the "isInIterator" check could look to see whether the *same file* is being included twice, eg by keeping a list of the files included so far, and returning true only if the same string is encountered twice? That would allow multiple inclusions, but not mess with ids for a single inclusion.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.