[jira] Updated: (CXF-2680) wsdlvalidator ignores WSDL constraints on element order

["Dennis Sosnoski (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Sosnoski updated CXF-2680:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: library-plain.wsdl

Sample invalid WSDL accepted by -validate flag.

> wsdlvalidator ignores WSDL constraints on element order
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-2680
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2680
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tooling
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.5
>            Reporter: Dennis Sosnoski
>         Attachments: library-plain.wsdl
>
>
> When running WSDLToJava with the -validate flag a WSDL with elements in incorrect order is accepted without complaint. In the example tested, the wsdl:service element precedes the wsdl:types element. This is a violation of the WSDL 1.1 schema definition, which defines the wsdl:definitions element structure as:
>    <complexType name="definitionsType">
>       <complexContent>
>          <extension base="wsdl:documented">
>             <sequence>
>                <element ref="wsdl:import" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>                <element ref="wsdl:types" minOccurs="0"/>
>                <element ref="wsdl:message" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>                <element ref="wsdl:portType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>                <element ref="wsdl:binding" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>                <element ref="wsdl:service" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>                <any namespace="##other" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
>                   <annotation>
>                      <documentation>to support extensibility elements </documentation>
>                   </annotation>
>                </any>
>             </sequence>
>             <attribute name="targetNamespace" type="uriReference" use="optional"/>
>             <attribute name="name" type="NMTOKEN" use="optional"/>
>          </extension>
>       </complexContent>
>   </complexType>
> If there's going to be a -validate flag it should perform a proper validation of the WSDL. I realize it's common for implementations to accept invalid WSDL of this type, but there should at least be a warning generated so that users will realize their WSDL is not actually valid.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.