You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Alexander Rukletsov <ru...@gmail.com> on 2018/08/09 14:15:22 UTC

Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Aug. 9, 2018, 2:15 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.


Summary (updated)
-----------------

Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.


Bugs: MESOS-8975
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

See summary.


Diffs
-----

  src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/2/


Testing
-------

See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/


Thanks,

Alexander Rukletsov


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review207114
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [68224, 68225, 68131]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On Aug. 9, 2018, 2:21 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 9, 2018, 2:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot Windows <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review210314
-----------------------------------------------------------



PASS: Mesos patch 68131 was successfully built and tested.

Reviews applied: `['68131']`

All the build artifacts available at: http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2571/mesos-review-68131

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Alexander Rukletsov <ru...@gmail.com>.

> On Nov. 6, 2018, 12:19 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> > src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
> > Lines 616 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3-4/?file=2070789#file2070789line620>
> >
> >     Last time we tried running this benchmark, we discovered a dead-lock caused by the interaction between the use of libprocess worker threads in both our test code and in the mesos code. 
> >     
> >     Ideally we wouldn't use libprocess at all here, but to avoid another big change late in the review cycle, adding a check like this should be sufficient:
> >     ```
> >     if (numClients >= LIBPROCESS_NUM_WORKER_THREADS - 3) {
> >       cerr << "Not enough worker threads for the desired number of clients.";
> >       exit(1);
> >     }
> >     ```

Though I'm in favour of the idea, I'm not sure we can reliably get `LIBPROCESS_NUM_WORKER_THREADS` in tests. Do you think we should try find some substitute or punt on this and leave a comment?


> On Nov. 6, 2018, 12:19 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> > src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
> > Line 646 (original), 702 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3-4/?file=2070789#file2070789line707>
> >
> >     Given that we're capturing and printing baseline statistics anyways, would it make sense to print the relative slowdown between baseline performance and performance under load here, to get a metric that is comparable across Mesos versions?

I'm not sure what a formual for a standard relative slowdown would be : ). Do you have a suggestion? I'm inclining to leave it as is.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review210347
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Alexander Rukletsov <ru...@gmail.com>.

> On Nov. 6, 2018, 12:19 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> > src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
> > Line 640 (original), 674-677 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3-4/?file=2070789#file2070789line679>
> >
> >     I'm a bit confused by the intention behind the stop condition:
> >     
> >     My best guess is that you want to ensure that you have constant load during the whole duration of the benchmark. However, in that case it seems like the requests to `/state` should not be limited to a specific number but continue indefinitely, and `stop` should be set to true after the required number of requests to the indicator endpoint have happened.
> >     
> >     On the other hand, if the current implementation is as intended, I think the message should read `launching *up to* {numRequests} requests`, because there's no guarantee that the loop with requests for the indicator endpoint will be the one finishing first. Also, in this case I think the comments could be a bit more specific about the intention.

I've swapped `indicator` and the `state` endpoints in regard to stopping condition. I've also adjusted the comment. Marking as read; let me know if you think something else should be done additionally.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review210347
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp fbfffb69930c30b038f74e0b831fc0ae41c820f0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Benno Evers <be...@mesosphere.com>.

> On Nov. 6, 2018, 12:19 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> > src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
> > Lines 616 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3-4/?file=2070789#file2070789line620>
> >
> >     Last time we tried running this benchmark, we discovered a dead-lock caused by the interaction between the use of libprocess worker threads in both our test code and in the mesos code. 
> >     
> >     Ideally we wouldn't use libprocess at all here, but to avoid another big change late in the review cycle, adding a check like this should be sufficient:
> >     ```
> >     if (numClients >= LIBPROCESS_NUM_WORKER_THREADS - 3) {
> >       cerr << "Not enough worker threads for the desired number of clients.";
> >       exit(1);
> >     }
> >     ```
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
>     Though I'm in favour of the idea, I'm not sure we can reliably get `LIBPROCESS_NUM_WORKER_THREADS` in tests. Do you think we should try find some substitute or punt on this and leave a comment?

I think it's fine to punt for now, assuming that the comment WILL BE VERY NOTICABLE. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9400 for this purpose.


> On Nov. 6, 2018, 12:19 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> > src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
> > Line 646 (original), 702 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3-4/?file=2070789#file2070789line707>
> >
> >     Given that we're capturing and printing baseline statistics anyways, would it make sense to print the relative slowdown between baseline performance and performance under load here, to get a metric that is comparable across Mesos versions?
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
>     I'm not sure what a formual for a standard relative slowdown would be : ). Do you have a suggestion? I'm inclining to leave it as is.

I'm itching to sit down with a statistics textbook to figure this out, but for efficiency's sake let's leave it as is for now :)


- Benno


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review210347
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp fbfffb69930c30b038f74e0b831fc0ae41c820f0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Benno Evers <be...@mesosphere.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review210347
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Line 493 (original), 503 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295016>

    Do we still need the `Multiclient` suffix if we're not going to commit the `Delay` version?



src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Line 598 (original), 605 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295007>

    As far as I can tell, we only use `ATOMIC_VAR_INIT` in libprocess, in Mesos the usual constructor is used. (see e.g. the atomic `offerCallbacks` in `hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp`)
    
    Also, per our style guide `std::atomic_bool` is preferred over `std::atomic<bool>`.



src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Line 600 (original), 607 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295008>

    s/exist/exit/



src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Line 604 (original), 611 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295010>

    %s/repeateRequests/repeatedRequests/



src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Lines 616 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295013>

    Last time we tried running this benchmark, we discovered a dead-lock caused by the interaction between the use of libprocess worker threads in both our test code and in the mesos code. 
    
    Ideally we wouldn't use libprocess at all here, but to avoid another big change late in the review cycle, adding a check like this should be sufficient:
    ```
    if (numClients >= LIBPROCESS_NUM_WORKER_THREADS - 3) {
      cerr << "Not enough worker threads for the desired number of clients.";
      exit(1);
    }
    ```



src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Lines 663 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295009>

    You should probably check that the future wasn't failed before calling `.get()`.



src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Line 640 (original), 674-677 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295014>

    I'm a bit confused by the intention behind the stop condition:
    
    My best guess is that you want to ensure that you have constant load during the whole duration of the benchmark. However, in that case it seems like the requests to `/state` should not be limited to a specific number but continue indefinitely, and `stop` should be set to true after the required number of requests to the indicator endpoint have happened.
    
    On the other hand, if the current implementation is as intended, I think the message should read `launching *up to* {numRequests} requests`, because there's no guarantee that the loop with requests for the indicator endpoint will be the one finishing first. Also, in this case I think the comments could be a bit more specific about the intention.



src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Lines 693 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295012>

    I would advise against using `auto` here, since figuring out the actual type is not trivial. (one technically has to go the declaration of `process::collect()` in a different file)



src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp
Line 646 (original), 702 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#comment295015>

    Given that we're capturing and printing baseline statistics anyways, would it make sense to print the relative slowdown between baseline performance and performance under load here, to get a metric that is comparable across Mesos versions?


- Benno Evers


On Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review210315
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [68131]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review210677
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [68131]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp fbfffb69930c30b038f74e0b831fc0ae41c820f0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot Windows <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review210632
-----------------------------------------------------------



PASS: Mesos patch 68131 was successfully built and tested.

Reviews applied: `['68131']`

All the build artifacts available at: http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2615/mesos-review-68131

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp fbfffb69930c30b038f74e0b831fc0ae41c820f0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Alexander Rukletsov <ru...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Nov. 18, 2018, 8:10 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.


Bugs: MESOS-8975
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

See summary.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp fbfffb69930c30b038f74e0b831fc0ae41c820f0 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/5/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/4-5/


Testing
-------

See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/


Thanks,

Alexander Rukletsov


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Alexander Rukletsov <ru...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Nov. 4, 2018, 4:31 a.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.


Bugs: MESOS-8975
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

See summary.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/4/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3-4/


Testing
-------

See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/


Thanks,

Alexander Rukletsov


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review208210
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [68131]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On Aug. 30, 2018, 8:47 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 30, 2018, 8:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot Windows <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review208152
-----------------------------------------------------------



PASS: Mesos patch 68131 was successfully built and tested.

Reviews applied: `['68131']`

All the build artifacts available at: http://dcos-win.westus.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2266/mesos-review-68131

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Aug. 30, 2018, 8:47 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 30, 2018, 8:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Alexander Rukletsov <ru...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Aug. 30, 2018, 8:47 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.


Bugs: MESOS-8975
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

See summary.


Diffs
-----

  src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3/


Testing
-------

See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/


Thanks,

Alexander Rukletsov


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Mesos Reviewbot Windows <re...@mesos.apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/#review207116
-----------------------------------------------------------



PASS: Mesos patch 68131 was successfully built and tested.

Reviews applied: `['68224', '68225', '68131']`

All the build artifacts available at: http://dcos-win.westus.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2137/mesos-review-68131

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Aug. 9, 2018, 7:21 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 9, 2018, 7:21 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8975
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Re: Review Request 68131: Added MasterActorResponsiveness_BENCHMARK_Test.

Posted by Alexander Rukletsov <ru...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Aug. 9, 2018, 2:21 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.


Bugs: MESOS-8975
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8975


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

See summary.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/tests/master_benchmarks.cpp b6d6dc7c1752491e2da854018966374b624d6682 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/3/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68131/diff/2-3/


Testing
-------

See https://reviews.apache.org/r/68132/


Thanks,

Alexander Rukletsov