You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@beam.apache.org by "lostluck (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2024/08/09 17:01:26 UTC
[I] [prism] Support Stateful SDFs (state and timers) [beam]
lostluck opened a new issue, #32139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32139
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] [prism] Document contradiction between Stateful and Splittable DoFns [beam]
Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #32139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32139#issuecomment-3365556104
This issue has been closed due to lack of activity. If you think that is incorrect, you can reopen the issue at any time.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] [prism] Document contradiction between Stateful and Splittable DoFns [beam]
Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #32139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32139#issuecomment-3245182605
This issue has been marked as stale due to 150 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this issue still needs to be addressed, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can reopen the issue at any time. Thank you for your contributions.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] [prism] Document contradiction between Stateful and Splittable DoFns [beam]
Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] closed issue #32139: [prism] Document contradiction between Stateful and Splittable DoFns
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32139
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] [prism] Support Stateful SDFs (state and timers) [beam]
Posted by "lostluck (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
lostluck commented on issue #32139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32139#issuecomment-2292257797
In discussion with Kenn, we came to the conclusion that while from a user affordance perspective, they are orthogonal, and thus compatible features, Kenn noted "But in some sense they are, in fact, diametrical opposites. State is all about non-parallelism, while splitting is all about parallelism." and I can't help but agree.
I now have a task to document the contraindication in the programming guide and protocol buffers.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org