You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Antoine Pitrou (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/04/17 16:08:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (ARROW-4648) [C++/Question] Naming/organizational inconsistencies in cpp codebase

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Antoine Pitrou updated ARROW-4648:
----------------------------------
    Component/s: C++

> [C++/Question] Naming/organizational inconsistencies in cpp codebase
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-4648
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4648
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Krisztian Szucs
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.14.0
>
>
> Even after my eyes are used to the codebase, I still find the namings and/or code organization inconsistent.
> h2. File Formats
> So arrow already support a couple of file formats, namely parquet, feather, json, csv, orc, but their placement in the codebase is quiet odd:
> - parquet: src/parquet
> - feather: src/arrow/ipc/feather
> - orc: src/arrow/adapters/orc
> - csv: src/arrow/csv
> - json: src/arrow/json
> I might misunderstand the purpose of these sources, but I'd expect them to be organized under the same roof.
> h2. Inter-Process-Communication vs. Flight
> I'd expect flight's functionality from the ipc names. 
> Flight's placement is a bit odd too, because it has its own codename, it should be placed under cpp/src - like parquet, plasma, or gandiva.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)