2.2 needs a reviewer for http strict backport ...

[Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>]

Halp?

-- 
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com

Re: 2.2 needs a reviewer for http strict backport ...

[William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2.2 running clean under test suite for me on Linux.
>
> Same here, thanks Eric for backporting.
>
> PS: I had to apply the OPENSSL_NO_SSL3 patch for my debian
> (libssl-1.0.2) to compile.
>     One more vote please ;)
> PPS: The other (annoying) gcc warnings fix patches are welcome too :)

So I'm currently running regressions against all of the proposed backports,
including proxy / ssl bug fixes, given that SNI is very widely deployed now,
and SSL3 is now super-discouraged. Good set of proposals, Yann - thanks.

A few proxy bug fixes still need one more reviewer to be accepted.
I'll backport all which are accepted, and unless anyone raises an issue,
will move ahead with a tag tomorrow (Friday) to kick off a 2.2.32 release
vote.

Re: 2.2 needs a reviewer for http strict backport ...

[Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2.2 running clean under test suite for me on Linux.

Same here, thanks Eric for backporting.

PS: I had to apply the OPENSSL_NO_SSL3 patch for my debian
(libssl-1.0.2) to compile.
    One more vote please ;)
PPS: The other (annoying) gcc warnings fix patches are welcome too :)

Re: 2.2 needs a reviewer for http strict backport ...

[Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>]

Thanks Yann!

2.2 running clean under test suite for me on Linux.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Halp?
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> covener@gmail.com



-- 
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com