You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@openwhisk.apache.org by gi...@git.apache.org on 2017/08/02 20:23:32 UTC

[GitHub] aml2732 commented on issue #61: code coverage

aml2732 commented on issue #61: code coverage
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/pull/61#issuecomment-319787343
 
 
   I would say no - just because in order to generate code coverage, it has to run the tests. ... We'd be running the tests twice.
   It is a tool to be used if needed.  
   
   An alternative is we can decide not to add it to master: 
    - but maybe detail in a wiki page / other setup instructions for how to get the code coverage if you want it.  Downside of course - is that it takes time to follow instructions and setup. Whereas - current commit allows a report to be generated with 2 commands.
   
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services